Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Reger Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Religion$175kHealth$97kAnimals$30kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$10kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$9kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BILLINGS FOUR SQUARE CHURCH$7,000
DOWN THE STRETCH RANCE$6,000
GREAT PLAINS GATHERING$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MONTANA RESCUE MISSION$2,000
ALZHERIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
BILLINGS FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHRUC$1,000
ZOO MONTANA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 9%FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA: $3k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA: $3k → 9%ANGELA'S PIAZZA: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$325k · 16 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2020, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$325k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+9%

Still filing today

63%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $81k · revenue +117%
  • ZI
    ZooMontana Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +119%
  • BS
    BILLINGS STUDIO THEATRE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • PS
    PASADO'S SAFE HAVENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +113%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • RP
    ROSE PARK PTA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -85%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Billings Clinic

Billings clinic's mission is quality, compassionate cre for all, with a vision of reimagining health care through connection, service and innovation.

Health
2
Logan Health - Shelby

Logan health shelby is a 21-bed 501(c)(3), non-profit, community critical access hospital located in shelby, montana. the hospital serves toole county and surrounding communities providing emergency care, acute care, skilled swing bed…

Health
3
Yellowstone Valley Animal Shelter

Yellowstone valley animal shelter is dedicated to strengthening the human-animal bond by providing compassionate and high-quality care, education, and resources to the community.

Animals
4
Bozeman Deaconess Foundation

To support Bozeman Health Services by promoting community participation in and financial support of activities to improve community health and quality of life.

Philanthropy
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Stillwater Hospital Association

Stillwater hospital association is a rural integrated health care organization bringing together a physician clinic and hospital services to deliver quality coordinated care.

Health
7
Bmh Inc

Bingham memorial hospital is committed to the pursuit of excellence in its endeavor to provide a continuum of quality, compassionate healthcare services for our residents and for visitors to bingham county, in the most effective and cost…

Health
8
Logan Health - Whitefish

Logan health whitefish is a 501(c)(3), non-profit community critical access hospital located in whitefish, montana. the hospital and its outreach clinics serve flathead and lincoln counties, providing emergency care, acute and critical…

Health
9
Valley Children's Hospital

To provide high quality comprehensive healthcare services to children regardless of their ability to pay and to continuously improve the health and well-being of children.

Health
10
Benefis Hospitals Inc

We provide excellent care for all, healing body, mind and spirit.

Health
11
Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital

To improve community health and quality of life.

Health
12
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Vincent Healthcare Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rose Park Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAITH CHAPEL — $95,000 · OtherFAITH CHAPELST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $80,833 · OtherST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCTELOS CHURCH — $54,333 · OtherTELOS CHURCH+21 more — $99,500 · Other+21 moreZooMontana Inc — $13,500 · AnimalsPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN — $10,000 · AnimalsDown the Stretch Ranch — $6,000 · AnimalsANGELAS PIAZZA INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE — $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Fistula Foundation — $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $2,500 · HealthBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BILLINGS INC — $3,500 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $3,500 · Youth Development
Other$329,666Animals$29,500Human Services$12,500Health$7,500Education$5,000Community Improvement$3,500Youth Development$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $80,833 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetZooMontana Inc — $13,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBILLINGS STUDIO THEATRE INC — $10,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPASADO'S SAFE HAVEN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANGELAS PIAZZA INC — $7,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDown the Stretch Ranch — $6,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSE PARK PTA — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BILLINGS INC — $3,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA RESCUE MISSION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ZooMontana Inc
  • Who funds BILLINGS STUDIO THEATRE INC
  • Who funds PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN
  • Who funds BILLINGS CLINIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANGELAS PIAZZA INC
  • Who funds Down the Stretch Ranch
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation
  • Who funds BILLINGS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds ROSE PARK PTA
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BILLINGS INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF YELLOWSTONE COUNTY
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds Shriner's International
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING
  • Who funds MONTANA RESCUE MISSION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montana Community Foundation IncMT25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · GE McDonald Foundation · Johnson Family Foundation · Scl Health - Montana · Charles M Bair Family Trust · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Brosovich Family Foundation · Donald & Carol Roberts Foundation in Memory of Virginia K Weston Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Reger Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph