· Private foundation
Redgates Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL | $7,000 |
| EFFECTIVE MINISTRIES INC | $5,000 |
| KICKSTART KIDS | $5,000 |
| RVA HOPE CENTER | $3,000 |
| CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY | $3,000 |
| HOPEWAY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| HAMPDEN-SYNDNEY COLLEGE | $2,500 |
| ST ANDREWS SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| ST JAMES CHILDRENS CENTER | $2,500 |
| VCU MASSEY CANCER CENTER | $2,000 |
| SENIOR SERVICES | $2,000 |
| JHW FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| UNC SCHOOL OF THE ARTS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against +85% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KDKick Drugs Out of America Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +5%
- AJANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +120%
- EMEFFECTIVE MINISTRIES INC5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- C(CARITAS (THE HEALING PLACE)one grant, 2020 · $4k
- HCHOPE CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $2k
- UOUniversity of North Carolina School of the Arts Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +85%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Good Shepherd Episcopal School is to inspire each child to achieve academic excellence within a diverse, nurturing community that builds character and fosters respect for one another and our shared environment, locally and…
Rise richmond's mission is to cultivate the god-given potential of students in richmond's east end through learning opportunities that equip them to flourish.
Provide an education to children in lower and middle school using classical christian methodology.
The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…
The mission of Chesterton Academy is to help parents raise up a new generation of joyful leaders and saints, educated in the classical tradition and the truths of the Catholic faith.
The school has been formed for charitable and educational purposes to develop curriculum for the use in training and educating students in the traditional academic disciplines and skills essential for success in college and the…
Regents' mission is to provide a classical and christian education, founded upon and informed by a biblical worldview, that equips our students to know, love, and practice that which is true, good, and the beautiful and challenges them to…
To cultivate curious, collaborative, and creative thinkers in a christ-centered community.
Foxcroft's mission is to help every girl explore her unique voice and to develop the skills, confidence, and courage to share it with the world with emphasis on Our Values of Respect, Integrity, Kindness, Service.
The williams school builds with each child the foundation for academic, moral and social success. a williams school student embodies confidence, integrity and a love of learning.
The mission of st. joseph's villa is to provide children with special needs and their families the opportunity to succeed through effective and innovative programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anna Julia Cooper School and the most unlike its peers is Kick Drugs Out of America Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kick Drugs Out of America Foundation ↗
- Who funds ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EFFECTIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds HopeWay Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
- Who funds THE JHW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER ↗
- Who funds UP RVA ↗
- Who funds RVA Hope Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WINSTON-SALEM STREET SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds University of North Carolina School of the Arts Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Richard Wood Averill Charitable Trust aka Richard Wood Averill Foundation · 4g Foundation (Fka Nordley-Gottwald Fndn · The Charles M Caravati Foundation Fund · Flow Foundation Inc · Townebank Richmond Foundation · Shallow Ford Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Redgates Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.