Skip to content

· Public charity

Real Services Inc

Real services assists in establishing a community in which those we serve can maintain their independence to the maximum degree possible and find meaning and satisfaction throughout their lives.

$9.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$403k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.2MFood & Nutrition$1.4MHealth$1.1MPhilanthropy$403kCrime & Legal$247kHousing & Shelter$239k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $1,108,306, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,224,860 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,116,554 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $357k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $344k
  • $250k+1 grant · $403k
$38,350
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY$403,037
LAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS$114,036
COUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY$106,608
PALADIN INC$66,437
INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES INC$56,430
KOSCIUSKO COMMUNITY SENIOR SERVICES$47,008
KOSCIUSKO COMMUNITY SENIOR SERVICES$47,008
KROC CENTER$43,328
COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES$38,350
MEALS ON WHEELS OF GOSHEN$36,985
NORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH$33,000
ELKHART CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$23,748
MARSHALL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$20,450
MARSHALL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$20,450
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ELKHART CO$18,667
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $42k → 11%St Vincent DePaul Society of St Joseph County: $35k → 13%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $42k → 11%St Vincent DePaul Society of St Joseph County: $27k → 13%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $41k → 11%St Vincent DePaul Society of St Joseph County: $23k → 13%COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $38k → 11%Paladin Inc: $94k → 15%Michiana Resources Inc: $93k → 15%Michiana Resources Inc: $86k → 15%Michiana Resources Inc: $86k → 15%Paladin Inc: $85k → 15%GUARDIANSHIP - REAL SERVICES INC: $30k → 13%PALADIN INC: $83k → 15%Combined Community Services: $58k → 11%PALADIN INC: $83k → 15%Combined Community Services: $53k → 11%PALADIN INC: $73k → 15%Combined Community Services: $49k → 11%GUARDIANSHIP - REAL SERVICES INC: $25k → 13%PALADIN INC: $66k → 15%GUARDIANSHIP - REAL SERVICES INC: $23k → 13%Combined Community Services: $47k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS - REAL SERVICES INC: $17k → 13%MEALS ON WHEELS - REAL SERVICES INC: $17k → 13%MEALS ON WHEELS - REAL SERVICES INC: $16k → 13%Combined Community Services: $35k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS - REAL SERVICES INC: $15k → 13%The Center for Hospice and Pallative Care Inc: $442k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 19 repeat orgs$889k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
1

Total granted

$5.7M
$442k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-10%

Still filing today

95%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $446k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PALADIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $749k · revenue +46%
  • LC
    LAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $679k · revenue +166%
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $677k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $442k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
2
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
3
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
4
Martin County Senior Citizens Housing Inc

Provide housing for senior citizens of Martin County Indiana

—
5
Posey County Council On Aging Inc

Services for senior citizens of posey county, indiana

Human Services
6
Marion County Council On Aging Inc

Services for the elderly

Human Services
7
Meals On Wheels Inc

Meals on wheels is the leading privately funded organization promoting dignity and independent living for the homebound, through volunteer delivery of nutritious meals in the greater indianapolis area.

Food & Nutrition
8
Allen County Council on Aging Inc

To provide services which enhance the quality of life of Allen County residents age 60 and older so that they may remain living independently in their own homes with dignity and choice as long as possible.

—
9
Mid-Land Meals Inc

To plan, coordinate, and provide meals and nutritional services primarily for the elderly, disabled, and low-income individuals in the state of Indiana.

—
10
Lancaster County Council On Aging

The mission of the lancaster county council on aging is to provide a system of coordinated and comprehensive services to enable older persons of lancaster county to continue to maintain their independence.

Human Services
11
Iosco Co Commission On Aging Inc

To coordinate public and private programs promoting and safeguarding the independence and well being of senior citizens of iosco county, michigan.

Human Services
12
Aging and in-Home Services of Northeast Indiana Inc

To promote dignity, independence, and advocacy for all older adults and persons with disabilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council On Aging of Elkhart County Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Margarets House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING AND AGED INC: $793,458 · OtherKOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING AND AGED INCLAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $679,047 · OtherLAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INCCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $677,204 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INCMARSHALL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $430,679 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGTHE WINDOW INC: $316,583 · OtherTHE WINDOW INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COU: $239,346 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COULaPorte Meals on Wheels: $118,557 · Other+2 more: $115,518 · OtherPALADIN INC: $749,234 · Human ServicesPALADIN INCTHE CENTER FOR HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $442,175 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR HOSPICE & PALLIA…COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $405,327 · Human ServicesCOMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICESREAL SERVICES INC: $142,727 · Human ServicesREAL SERVICES INCST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $85,112 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $403,037 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION INC: $164,100 · HealthCOMPASSIONATE HEALTH CENTER INC: $115,633 · HealthElkhart General Hospital Inc: $58,909 · HealthIndiana Legal Services Inc: $247,212 · Crime & LegalSt Margarets House: $183,418 · Recreation & SportsELKHART CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $176,598 · EducationMarshall County Neighborhood Council: $56,277 · Community Improvement
Other$3,370,392Human Services$1,824,575Philanthropy$403,037Health$338,642Crime & Legal$247,212Recreation & Sports$183,418Education$176,598Community Improvement$56,277

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING AND AGED INC: $793,458 over 9y, 32% of budgetPALADIN INC: $749,234 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetLAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $679,047 over 9y, 18% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $677,204 over 9y, 14% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $442,175 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $430,679 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetCOMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $405,327 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $403,037 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE WINDOW INC: $316,583 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetIndiana Legal Services Inc: $247,212 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COU: $239,346 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetSt Margarets House: $183,418 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetELKHART CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $176,598 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION INC: $164,100 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $142,727 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE HEALTH CENTER INC: $115,633 over 9y, 12% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $85,112 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $72,190 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetElkhart General Hospital Inc: $58,909 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarshall County Neighborhood Council: $56,277 over 6y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING AND AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds PALADIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF ELKHART COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WINDOW INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana Legal Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ELKHART COU ↗
  • Who funds St Margarets House ↗
  • Who funds ELKHART CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA HISPANIC HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds REAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LA CASA DE AMISTAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Elkhart General Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds Marshall County Neighborhood Council ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Elkhart County IncIN19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Real Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Real Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Real Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph