Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Real Estate Alliance for Charity Inc

Promote the welfare of and provide charitable relief to those in need.

$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Human Services$75kFood & Nutrition$30kHealth$12kYouth Development$7kEducation$6k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $60,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $70,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$166k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALKER'S POINT YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER$15,000
BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER$15,000
SECURED FUTURES$15,000
FONDY FOOD CENTER$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $15k → 5%WALKER'S POINT YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $15k → 17%WALKER'S POINT YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER: $15k → 17%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $15k → 5%SECURED FUTURES: $15k → 17%SECURED FUTURES: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Workforce Connections Inc

Wci empowers individuals through employment and training services, helping people of all backgrounds including low-skilled and unskilled adults enter the workforce. we provide economically disadvantaged individuals and those facing…

Employment
2
Wisconsin Association for Runaway Services Inc

United to prevent and end youth homelessness in wisconsin.

Human Services
3
Youthlink

To be a community in which all youth, without regard to their living situation, have an equal opportunity to pursue and achieve their goals and dreams. the agency does this by supporting, resourcing, and empowering young people on their…

Human Services
4
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

We unite people to create positive lasting change in our community.

Philanthropy
5
Workforce Resource Inc

The mission of workforce resource, inc. is to empower people through employment.

Employment
6
Milwaukee Center for Independence Inc

Milwaukee center for independence, inc. (mcfi) partners with people of all abilities to advance their total health with a vision of creating healthy and hopeful communities.

Human Services
7
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
8
Nami Wisconsin Inc

The mission of nami wisconsin is to improve the quality of life of people affected by mental illness and promote recovery.

9
Southwest Minnesota Private Industry Council Inc

Building tomorrow's workforce through training, leadership, and economic development.

Employment
10
Bender Leadership Academy

Bender leadership academy's mission is to increase long-term competitive employment for youth with disabilities. bender leadership academy is founded on a commitment to serving the disability community, with a focus on the value and…

Employment
11
Achieveability

Strives to permanently break the cycle of poverty for philadelphia families

Housing & Shelter
12
Alternative Paths Inc

Provide an array of quality behavioral healthcare services designed to meet the needs of residents of medina county and surrounding areas.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker's Point Youth and Family Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fondy Food Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SECURED FUTURES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSECURED FUTURES INCWALKER'S POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesWALKER'S POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER INCBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INCBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCFONDY FOOD CENTER INC — $15,000 · Food & NutritionFONDY FOOD CE…MOMS MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $7,000 · HealthWISCONSIN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATI — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $6,250 · EducationASSOCIATION FOR RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WITH HANDICAPS — $5,000 · Other
Human Services$90,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Health$7,000Youth Development$7,000Education$6,250Other$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSECURED FUTURES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWALKER'S POINT YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFONDY FOOD CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOMS MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWISCONSIN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATI — $7,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WITH HANDICAPS — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Real Estate Alliance for Charity Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Real Estate Alliance for Charity Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Real Estate Alliance for Charity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph