Skip to content

· Private foundation

Read to Achieve Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$19kInternational$17kAnimals$8kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$885Public Safety & Disaster$750Housing & Shelter$641Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$240
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,270
CIEE (Council on International Educational Exchange)$2,000
Family Giving Tree$1,200
Humane Society Silicon Valley$1,100
The Salvation Army USA Western Territory$1,041
Doctors Without Borders$240
Basilica di San Marco$122
Save the Children$72
Individual grant recipient$54
Vatican City Donation (Holy See)$43
The British Museum$34
Goodwill of Silicon Valley$17
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 69% of grant dollars ($44k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 31% that went abroad ($19k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
OR
NV
CT
CA
MO
MD
DC
HI
TX

Beyond the US: 31% of all-years giving ($19k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Hong Kong$15k · 13 grants
France$3k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$835 · 2 grants
China$240 · 1 grant
Italy$165 · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 7 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
45

Total granted

$28k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-11%

Still filing today

71%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CIEE Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +44%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $6k · revenue +52%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AB
    Aberdeen Baptist Lui Ming Choi College
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AF
    American Friends of the Louvre
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • HS
    Humane Society SV
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
7
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
9
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
10
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
11
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
12
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bring Me a Book Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Aberdeen Baptist Lui Ming Choi College: $10,000 · OtherAberdeen Baptist Lui Ming Choi CollegeTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE: $2,624 · OtherTHE FAMILY GIVING TREEIndividual grant recipient: $2,270 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCIEE (Council on International Educational Exchange): $2,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of the Louvre: $1,850 · OtherDoctors without Border: $1,580 · OtherHumane Society SV: $1,303 · OtherBring Me A Book Hong Kong Limited: $1,277 · Other+38 more: $14,866 · Other+38 moreCIEE Inc: $11,919 · InternationalCIEE IncSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,667 · InternationalSave The Children Federation …+1 more: $158 · InternationalHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $5,599 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCI…SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $620 · AnimalsSAN FRANCIS…MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300 · Animals+1 more: $100 · AnimalsPRECIOUS DREAMS FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyHALO FOUNDATION: $250 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $58 · PhilanthropyCoalition for Clean Air: $385 · EnvironmentCOOL THE EARTH INC: $200 · Environment300 STEWART AVENUE CORPORATION: $583 · Arts & CultureMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $513 · Food & Nutrition
Other$37,770International$16,744Animals$6,619Philanthropy$808Environment$585Arts & Culture$583Food & Nutrition$513

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIEE Inc: $11,919 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $5,599 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,667 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE: $2,624 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRING ME A BOOK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $620 over 1y, 0.0% of budget300 STEWART AVENUE CORPORATION: $583 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRECIOUS DREAMS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCoalition for Clean Air: $385 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHALO FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL THE EARTH INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $58 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CIEE Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY GIVING TREE ↗
  • Who funds BRING ME A BOOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds 300 STEWART AVENUE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRECIOUS DREAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Clean Air ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HALO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COOL THE EARTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Read to Achieve Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Read to Achieve Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Read to Achieve’s filings →

More from the funding graph