· Private foundation
Reach Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $28,000 |
| CRU | $14,760 |
| CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH | $12,500 |
| ABWE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| DNA MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| SOLUTIONS OF FOLSOM | $10,000 |
| CROSS TRAINING MINISTRIES INC | $10,000 |
| LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| TEAMS 518 MINISTRIES | $7,000 |
| THAT DAY | $7,000 |
| NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC | $6,200 |
| CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC | $5,240 |
| E2 FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| URBAN IMPACT MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +8%
- T5TEAM 5 18 MINISTRIES3× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue +33%
- UIURBAN IMPACT MINISTRIES3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- DNDISCIPLESHIP NETWORK OF AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $10k
- CICBMC INCone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -7%
- NFNorthshore Food Bankgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helpfamiliesimpactedbydomesticabusefindredemption
Through relational discipleship, soul care counseling, and much more we teach men to establish their identity in christ, their life around scripture, and their emotional and spiritually health in the promises of god. helping them to…
Biblical counseling
Drug & alcohol rehabilitation for men
The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…
Christ centered residential ministry primarily helping african american men overcome their life controlling addictions so they can successfully re enter society as productive citizens
The organization's purpose is to provide resources for men taking the next steps from recovery to a sustainable lifestyle. Our goal is to create a path to success for men struggling with a broken life pattern by providing a Christ-centered…
To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Impact Ministries and the most unlike its peers is West 30s Redemption Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THAT DAY ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM 5 18 MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds URBAN IMPACT MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds REFLECTIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHSHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Reach Alliance ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds CBMC INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES SAMARITAN ↗
- Who funds H2O MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NO HEART LEFT BEHIND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVINGTON YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW ORLEANS TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
- Who funds Northshore Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CROSS TRAINING MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds West 30s Redemption Company ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baptist Community Ministries · Ijn Foundation · Al & Diane Kramer Foundation Inc · Second Harvest Food Bank Greater New Orleans and Acadiana · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Rocker Family Foundation · Northshore Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reach Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.