Skip to content

· Private foundation

RCL Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$161kYouth Development$110kHealth$59kInternational$45kReligion$30kHuman Services$15kEmployment$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CA$31,000
PENINSULAR COMM CHILDRENS HOSP$14,990
Cal Poly$10,000
USC CATHOLIC CENTER$5,000
TORRANCE MEMORIAL HOME HEALTH HOSPI$1,700
MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW$1,500
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA$1,500
Holiday Fund$1,500
SAINT JOHN FISHER PARISH$1,000
Manes for Movement$1,000
Center of Hope$500
LACER FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $2k → 7%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $200 → 10%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $2k → 7%The Colleagues: $250 → 14%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $1k → 7%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $1k → 7%The Colleagues: $200 → 14%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $1k → 7%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $1k → 7%MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302k · 23 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
27

Total granted

$302k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+14%

Still filing today

17%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CAL POLY CORPORATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +18%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    6× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +27%
  • TC
    THE COLLEAGUES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $450 · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +111%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • PP
    PV Prep Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
2
Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement
3
California State University Los Angeles Foundation

To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…

Education
4
California State University Los Angeles Alumni Association Inc

To foster relationships among alumni, students and community by providing services and activities that build loyalty, support and a lifelong connection to the university.

—
5
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
6
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
7
Children's Law Center of California

Children's law center of california (clc) provides legal representation for children and youth impacted by abuse and neglect. we advocate for our clients by supporting families; fighting for reunification, permanence, educational…

—
8
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
9
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
10
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
11
California Charter Schools Association Advocates

To increase the involvement of the charter school community in the political process, create a pipeline of charter school supporters and activitists, endorse and support public officials who are committed to california charter public…

Education
12
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pencils of Promise Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENINSULAR COMM CHILDRENS HOSP: $107,960 · OtherPENINSULAR COMM CHILDRENS HOSPLITTLE SISTER OF THE POOR: $45,213 · OtherLITTLE SISTER OF THE POORTORRANCE MEMORIAL HOME HEALTH HOSPI: $27,700 · OtherTORRANCE MEMORIAL HOME HEALTH HOSPIUSC CATHOLIC CENTER: $25,550 · OtherUSC CATHOLIC CENTERSPINAL CORD SOCIETY: $10,500 · Other+35 more: $76,765 · Other+35 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $129,185 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIACAL POLY CORPORATION: $30,000 · EducationCAL POLY CORPORATION+2 more: $1,000 · EducationMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesTHE COLLEAGUES INC: $450 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $4,250 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,000 · HealthManes for Movement Inc: $1,000 · HealthThe Center of Hope: $500 · HealthTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC: $500 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FCOE INC: $200 · PhilanthropyPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $200 · International
Other$293,688Education$160,185Human Services$9,150Health$8,250Philanthropy$200International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $129,185 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC: $8,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLACER Foundation: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $4,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetManes for Movement Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLLEAGUES INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALOS VERDES WATER POLO CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FCOE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MENLO CHARITY HORSE SHOW INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds LACER Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Manes for Movement Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center of Hope ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization RCL Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from RCL Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on RCL’s filings →

    More from the funding graph