Skip to content
Razom Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Razom Inc

Razom, inc.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$725kArts & Culture$236kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kEducation$15k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $396,287, the rows itemized in this filing. The $16,463,898 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,067,611 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $274k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICANS TOGETHER FOR UKRAINE INC$138,542
HODOS FILMS INC$135,000
GLOBAL RESPONSE MEDICINE$27,745
ETHOS SOLUTIONS PHILANTHROPIC$20,000
LEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS$20,000
GLOBAL MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE INC$20,000
OU HEALTH$20,000
UKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND INC: $15k → 17%UKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND INC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $16M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $16M to organizations and $42k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Ukraine$16M · 100% · 69 grants · 36 people

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$679k · 4 repeat orgs$743k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$679k
$517k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HODOS FILMS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $530k
  • LG
    LEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $82k · revenue +35%
  • MI
    MedGlobal Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • United Help Ukraine Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $140k · revenue -81%
  • UC
    UKRAINIAN COMMUNITY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2022 · $131k
  • IA
    I AM U ARE WORLD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ukrainian Resistance Foundation

Provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine to help victims of the Russia-Ukraine war. the Organization provided direct assistance of cash, food, clothing, supplies, medical supplies and emergency vehicles to help the people of Ukraine

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Ukraine Aid

To provide humanitarian aid to the people of Ukraine in the provision of medical equipment and supplies reconstruction equipment and protective gear. We ship in-kind donated goods and make select purchases of goods.

International
3
Heal Traumas International Inc

Heal Ukraine Trauma (HUT) is the first initiative of Heal Traumas International, Inc., a mental health non-profit founded in 2022. Our mission is to help Ukrainians heal from the trauma of war so they can live fulfilling, productive lives.

Health
4
Ukraine Relief Fund Inc
International
5
American Ukranian Relief Association

American Ukranian Relief Organization (the Organization) intends to help Ukranians suffering from the war with Russian federation. As a volunteer based organization comprised mostly of Ukranians, the Organization would like to help bring…

International
6
Ukraine Freedom Fund

To help create a free, independent, and democratic Ukraine where Ukrainians and people of other nationalities will have the right to freely associate and express their will in an open civil society free from corruption.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Ukrainian Refugee Foundation

URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Ukraine in Our Hearts Inc

To conduct humanitarian activities to meet the needs of the Ukrainian people including but not limited to assistance to the distribution of food, medicine, and supplies to areas ravaged by war poor and distressed, and the distribution of…

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
10
Ukraine Front Line Inc

Providing humanitarian relief to individuals and groups afflicted in Ukraine.

International
11
Ukraine War Relief Fund
International
12
Ukrainian Foundation

In 2006, Ukrainian Foundation was established by the immigrants from Ukraine to help the Ukrainian refugees adjust to their new home in the United States. Our base is in Portland, OR, a home to over 100,000 immigrants from Ukraine. With…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nova Ukraine; the most unlike its peers is Syrian Emergency Task Force. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HODOS FILMS: $530,000 · OtherHODOS FILMSAMERICANS TOGETHER FOR UKRAINE INC: $138,542 · OtherAMERICANS TOGETHER FOR UKRAINE INCUKRAINIAN COMMUNITY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $131,302 · OtherUKRAINIAN COMMUNITY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIAPAGAVA & SKRYPKA LLC: $40,000 · Other+4 more: $56,000 · Other+4 moreLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS: $81,692 · InternationalLEAP GLOBAL MISS…I AM U ARE WORLD INC: $70,000 · InternationalI AM U ARE WORLD…Global Response Management Inc: $27,745 · InternationalGlobal Response …SYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE: $15,000 · InternationalSYRIAN EMERGENCY…NOVA UKRAINE: $10,000 · InternationalUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $139,887 · Human ServicesUnited Help U…UKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND: $30,000 · Human ServicesUKRAINIAN HAB…ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterETHOS SOLUTIONS PHILANTHROPIC: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMedGlobal Inc: $37,140 · HealthGlobal Medical Knowledge Alliance Inc: $20,000 · HealthUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $15,000 · ReligionUKRAINIAN JERSEY CITY: $9,577 · Arts & Culture
Other$895,844International$204,437Human Services$169,887Public Safety & Disaster$70,000Health$57,140Religion$15,000Arts & Culture$9,577

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $139,887 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICANS TOGETHER FOR UKRAINE INC: $138,542 over 1y, 90% of budgetLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS: $81,692 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMedGlobal Inc: $37,140 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUKRAINIAN HABITAT FUND: $30,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc: $27,745 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetETHOS SOLUTIONS PHILANTHROPIC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN JERSEY CITY: $9,577 over 1y, 9.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Razom Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Razom Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Razom Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Razom Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Razom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home