Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond J Allen and Sally J Allen Charities Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$17kArts & Culture$12kHuman Services$7kInternational$4kEducation$3kHealth$2kHousing & Shelter$900Crime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
CHICAGO YACHT CLUB$350
LYRIC OPERA$275
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$200
Individual grant recipient$114
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bethshan Association: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$42k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+24%

Still filing today

22%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    First United Methodist Church
    5× · 2019–2024 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2021 · $8k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    2× · 2019–2024 · $6k

Funded once

  • ES
    ELMHURST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicago
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -1%
  • FC
    FRANKLIN CHILDREN'S FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The auditorium theatre of roosevelt university ("the auditorium"), an illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
3
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high-quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
4
The Chicago Philharmonic Society

To excite, engage, and transform diverse audiences with the beauty and power of music.

Arts & Culture
5
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
6
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
7
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
8
American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Advancing, promoting and preserving the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as the skills and professionalism of aaoms members to ensure patient access to safe and effective care.

—
9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
Illinois Manufacturers' Association

To strengthen the economic social environmental and governmental conditions for manufacturing and allied enterprises in the state of illinois, resulting in an englarged business base and increased employment.

—
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
The Executives' Club of Chicago

To be chicagos premier resources for connecting, developing, and growing best-in-class leaders to provide established and emerging leaders opportunities to develop and nurture meaningful relationships, participate in innovative…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Yacht Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

First United Methodist Church: $16,550 · OtherFirst United Methodist ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $8,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY: $6,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRoosevelt University: $2,500 · Other+15 more: $6,683 · Other+15 moreELMHURST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureELMHURST SYMPHONY A…Lyric Opera of Chicago: $1,050 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of Chic…ELMHURST ART MUSEUM: $500 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalBETHSHAN ASSOCIATION: $100 · Human Services
Other$53,033Arts & Culture$11,550International$4,000Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELMHURST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRoosevelt University: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELMHURST ART MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO YACHT CLUB: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHSHAN ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ELMHURST SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Roosevelt University ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YACHT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BETHSHAN ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond J Allen and Sally J Allen Charities Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond J Allen and Sally J Allen Charities Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond J Allen and Sally J Allen Charities Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph