Skip to content

· Public charity

Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation

Conducts and/or supports activities for the benefit of, performs the functions of, or carries out the purpose of the Community Foundation Of Northern Nevada.

$425k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$222k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Recreation & Sports$1.6MYouth Development$60kEducation$43k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $415,189, the rows itemized in this filing. The $425,189 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $337k
$42,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United States Diving Foundation Inc$221,562
Nevada Diving Center$65,000
International Swimming Hall of Fame$50,000
UNR Foundation$42,000
Dive RVA$14,127
World Acrobatics Society$12,500
Sierra Nevada Journeys$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INDIANAPOLIS STARS DIVING CLUB: $40k → 5%INDIANAPOLIS STARS DIVING CLUB: $38k → 5%Indianapolis Stars Diving Club Inc: $20k → 5%Indianapolis Stars Diving Club Inc: $17k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NV
IN
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$1.5M
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+57%

Still filing today

80%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Recreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $568k · revenue +77% · 73% of their budget
  • ND
    NEVADA DIVING CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $263k · revenue +65% · 82% of their budget
  • UO
    University of Nevada Reno Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $223k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • UA
    Union Americana De Natacion
    one grant, 2018 · $41k
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue +57%
  • CD
    CAL DIVING CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Aquatic Sports I

United states aquatic sports, inc is the national federation for all united states olympic aquatic sports. this includes usa swimming, usa diving, us artistic swimming, usa water polo, and us masters swi

—
2
Clavadistas Del Sol

Diving team training usa diving org

Recreation & Sports
3
Davis Aquadarts Inc

Through the sport of competitive swimming, dart is dedicated to empowering young people to commit to the pursuit of excellence and self-improvement in all aspects of life.

Recreation & Sports
4
United States Biathlon Association

The mission of usba is to encourage, improve and promote the sport of biathlon in the united states; help u.s. biathlon athletes achieve sustained competitive excellence in olympic, world championship and other international competitions…

—
5
The International Water Ski Racing Association Inc
Recreation & Sports
6
Usa Artistic Swimming

Appointed as the governing body by the us olympic committee, our mission is to provide leadership and resources for the promotion growth of synchronized swimming and to achieve competitive excellence at all levels and to develop broad…

—
7
Santa Clara Diving Club

Santa clara diving club is committed to developing local youth into exceptional athletes who are competitive locally, regionally, and nationally in springboard and platform diving.

Youth Development
8
Atlantic Diving Team Foundation Inc

School

Recreation & Sports
9
Monterey Bay Swim Club

Training, coaching and operating a youth swim team

Recreation & Sports
10
Dive Lab

To develop and promote the sport of diving for the purpose of fostering competitive diving teams and hosting competitions at the national and international levels.

Recreation & Sports
11
Canyons Aquatic Club

Competitive age swimming from ages 5 to 18 years of age. affiliated with scs & uss swimming. provide instruction, meets and support swimmers at national meets.

—
12
Us Water Rescue Dive Team

Water safety and awareness

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usa Diving Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Acrobatics Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INC: $568,034 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INCNEVADA DIVING CENTER: $263,000 · Recreation & SportsNEVADA DIVING CENTERUnion Americana De Natacion: $41,000 · Recreation & Sports+4 more: $62,883 · Recreation & Sports+4 moreUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $223,000 · EducationUniversity of Nevada…WORLD ACROBATICS SOCIETY: $52,500 · EducationWORLD ACROBATICS SOC…University of Kentucky Research Foundation: $29,136 · EducationUniversity of Kentuc…INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME: $170,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATION…ST PETERSBURG CLUB DIVING INC: $32,997 · OtherST PETERS…CAL DIVING CLUB: $26,250 · OtherCAL DIVIN…TOMAHAWK DIVING TEAM BOOSTER CLUB: $22,969 · OtherTOMAHAWK …HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $13,548 · OtherHUNTINGTO…FT LAUDERDALE DIVING BOOSTER CLUB INC: $13,447 · OtherFT LAUDER…PACIFIC DIVING ACADEMY USA INC: $13,000 · OtherPACIFIC D…MOUNTRAIL COUNTY AQUATICS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMOUNTRAIL…Southern Pacific Association - Unit ed States Divi: $6,000 · OtherINDIANAPOLIS STARS DIVING CLUB INC: $115,908 · Human ServicesSIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS: $60,000 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$934,917Education$304,636Arts & Culture$170,000Other$138,211Human Services$115,908Youth Development$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INC: $568,034 over 3y, 73% of budgetNEVADA DIVING CENTER: $263,000 over 8y, 82% of budgetUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $223,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME: $170,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS STARS DIVING CLUB INC: $115,908 over 5y, 18% of budgetSIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS: $60,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD ACROBATICS SOCIETY: $52,500 over 7y, 32% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $29,136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC: $27,991 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION VIEJO NADADORES FOUNDATION: $15,765 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDIVERVA: $14,127 over 2y, 10% of budgetUSA Swimming Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA DIVING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS STARS DIVING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ACROBATICS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Union Americana De Natacion ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION VIEJO NADADORES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIVERVA ↗
  • Who funds USA Swimming Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV40.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $227k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond C Rude Supporting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph