· Public charity
Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation
Conducts and/or supports activities for the benefit of, performs the functions of, or carries out the purpose of the Community Foundation Of Northern Nevada.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $415,189 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $425,189 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $337k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United States Diving Foundation Inc | $221,562 |
| Nevada Diving Center | $65,000 |
| International Swimming Hall of Fame | $50,000 |
| UNR Foundation | $42,000 |
| Dive RVA | $14,127 |
| World Acrobatics Society | $12,500 |
| Sierra Nevada Journeys | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2022 · $568k · revenue +16% · 73% of their budget
- NDNEVADA DIVING CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $263k · revenue +65% · 82% of their budget
- UOUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $223k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- UAUnion Americana De Natacionone grant, 2018 · $41k
- UOUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue +57%
- CDCAL DIVING CLUBone grant, 2017 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United states aquatic sports, inc is the national federation for all united states olympic aquatic sports. this includes usa swimming, usa diving, us artistic swimming, usa water polo, and us masters swi
Diving team training usa diving org
Through the sport of competitive swimming, dart is dedicated to empowering young people to commit to the pursuit of excellence and self-improvement in all aspects of life.
The mission of usba is to encourage, improve and promote the sport of biathlon in the united states; help u.s. biathlon athletes achieve sustained competitive excellence in olympic, world championship and other international competitions…
Appointed as the governing body by the us olympic committee, our mission is to provide leadership and resources for the promotion growth of synchronized swimming and to achieve competitive excellence at all levels and to develop broad…
Santa clara diving club is committed to developing local youth into exceptional athletes who are competitive locally, regionally, and nationally in springboard and platform diving.
School
Training, coaching and operating a youth swim team
To develop and promote the sport of diving for the purpose of fostering competitive diving teams and hosting competitions at the national and international levels.
Competitive age swimming from ages 5 to 18 years of age. affiliated with scs & uss swimming. provide instruction, meets and support swimmers at national meets.
Water safety and awareness
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Usa Diving Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Acrobatics Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED STATES DIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA DIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS STARS DIVING CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS ↗
- Who funds WORLD ACROBATICS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Union Americana De Natacion ↗
- Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION VIEJO NADADORES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIVERVA ↗
- Who funds USA Swimming Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.