Loading…
· Public charity
Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation
Supporting organization for the Community Foundation of Northern Nevada.
$425k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants
5
Communities
$222k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.
Recreation & Sports$894kEducation$305kArts & Culture$170kHuman Services$116kYouth Development$60kOther$179k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
equipment facilitiesparticipantsamateurswimmingfacilities upgradestraining
2019
—
2020
training
2021
training
2022
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $337k
$42,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
- United States Diving Foundation Inc$221,562
- Nevada Diving Center$65,000
- International Swimming Hall of Fame$50,000
- UNR Foundation$42,000
- Dive RVA$14,127
- World Acrobatics Society$12,500
- Sierra Nevada Journeys$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
10
Total granted
$1.5M
$186k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+97%
+47%
Still filing today
80%
30%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Recreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUnited States Diving Foundation Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $568k · revenue +19% · 73% of their budget
- NDNevada Diving Center8× · 2017–2024 · $263k · revenue +65% · 82% of their budget
- UFUNR Foundation - Morrill Hall Alumni Center8× · 2017–2024 · $223k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- UAUNION AMERICANA DE NATACIONone grant, 2018 · $41k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue +47%
- CDCAL DIVING CLUBone grant, 2017 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Usa Swimming Inc
National governing body for the sport of swimming. we administer competitive swimming in accordance with the ted stevens olympic & amateur sports act.
Recreation & Sports
2
United States Aquatic Sports I
Usas supports its member ngbs by providing representation and advocacy with the internationalaquatics federations.
—
3
Usa Artistic Swimming
Appointed as the governing body by the us olympic committee, our mission is to provide leadership and resources for the promotion growth of synchronized swimming and to achieve competitive excellence at all levels and to develop broad…
—
4
United States Biathlon Association
National governing body for the olympic sport of biathlon.
—
5
Us Water Rescue Dive Team
Water safety and awareness
—
6
Union Americana De Natacion
To develop aquatic sports in the Americas and help participants achieve individual excellence, in sport and in life.
Recreation & Sports
7
San Ramon Valley Aquatics
Administration, supervision, & training of uss swim team.
—
8
Atlantic Diving Team Foundation Inc
School
Recreation & Sports
9
Irvine Novaquatics Inc
Competitive swim instruction
—
10
Clavadistas Del Sol
Diving team training usa diving org
Recreation & Sports
11
United States Olympic and Paralympic
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes.
Recreation & Sports
12
Monterey Bay Swim Club
Training, coaching and operating a youth swim team
Recreation & Sports
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Viejo Nadadores Foundation and the most unlike its peers is World Acrobatics Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Recreation & Sports$893,917Education$304,636Other$179,211Arts & Culture$170,000Human Services$115,908Youth Development$60,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United States Diving Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Nevada Diving Center ↗
- Who funds UNR Foundation - Morrill Hall Alumni Center ↗
- Who funds International Swimming Hall of Fame ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Stars Diving Club Inc ↗
- Who funds Sierra Nevada Journeys ↗
- Who funds World Acrobatics Society ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS ↗
- Who funds MISSION VIEJO NADADORES DIVE TEAM ↗
- Who funds Dive RVA ↗
- Who funds USA SWIMMING FOUUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV39.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Nevada Diving Center.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +65% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 453941312 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Nevada Diving Center, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 82% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Raymond C Rude Supporting Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines