Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ray Marglous Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$194k
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Philanthropy$161kHealth$88kReligion$37kEducation$28kArts & Culture$9kEnvironment$5kYouth Development$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k17 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$600
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fidelity Chartible Gift Fund$90,000
Fidelity Charitble Gift Fund$50,000
Pedal For The Cause$25,000
BJC Foundation$10,500
Temple Emanuel$4,450
St Louis Art Museum Foundation$2,585
COCA$2,500
John Burroughs School$1,923
Jewish Federation of St Louis$1,800
Gateway Mens Chorus$1,250
Magic House$600
BUSA Educational Foundation$569
Henry Williams Contemporary Dance$540
Saint Louis Service Bureau$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Saint Louis Service Bureau: $500 → 11%St Louis Service Bureau: $500 → 11%Pedal For The Cause: $25k → 11%Pedal For The Cause: $25k → 11%Pedal The Cause: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MA
OH
PA
MO
KY
KS
TN
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$251k · 11 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
35

Total granted

$251k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+16%

Still filing today

55%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    PEDAL THE CAUSE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $51k · revenue +69%
  • Vanderbilt University
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +65%
  • MI
    Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
    4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +30%
  • CS
    Community School
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • FG
    Fidelty Giving Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

2
St Louis University

The mission of saint louis university is the pursuit of truth for the greater glory of god and for the service of humanity. the university seeks excellence in the fulfillment of its corporate purposes of teaching, research, health care and…

Education
3
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
4
St Louis Science Center Foundation

Support the st. louis science center and its comprehensive array of educational outreach programs to the community in order to increase interest, understanding and enthusiasm for stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics).

Science & Tech
5
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
6
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
7
Hillel At Washington University in St Louis

The mission of hillel at washington university in st louis is to be a catalyst for jewish life among college students in st louis. we connect students with one another and with jewish culture and traditions through service and social…

8
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
9
University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis

The university's mission is to educate and advance communities of discovery to foster a healthier society.

Education
10
Art St Louis

Art St Louis is a nonprofit community art organization and gallery dedicated to enriching lives through the creative activity of our region's contemporary visual artists. Through exhibition, education, and exchange, we connect and inspire…

Arts & Culture
11
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
12
National Louis University

National louis university is an inclusive, innovative community providing educational opportunities that inspire and empower all learners as they prepare for and advance in meaningful lives and productive careers.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Busa Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCatholic Health System Foun…Affordable Housing for Vuln…St. Louis Community Foundat…Food Assistance & Community…Homeless Services and Famil…Performing Arts Organizatio…Charter and Independent Sch…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%9%5–10yr16%17%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr17%30%35–55yr19%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%6%5–10yr16%48%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr17%7%35–55yr19%36%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
14%
1,453/10,132

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fidelity — $140,000 · OtherFidelityFidelity Chartible Gift Fund — $90,000 · OtherFidelity Chartible Gift FundFidelity Charitble Gift Fund — $50,000 · OtherFidelity Charitble Gift FundTEMPLE EMANUEL — $20,350 · OtherCOCA — $16,550 · OtherCommunity School — $15,161 · Other+36 more — $76,883 · Other+36 morePEDAL THE CAUSE — $51,000 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE C…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $30,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $3,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthVanderbilt University — $5,500 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $5,250 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $1,923 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $500 · EducationSaint Louis Fashion Fund — $500 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationST LOUIS AQUARIUM AT UNION STATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 · AnimalsST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $2,585 · Arts & CultureCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $600 · Arts & CultureJewish Federation of St Louis — $1,800 · PhilanthropyBUSA Educational Foundation Inc — $569 · Philanthropy
Other$408,944Human Services$52,000Health$33,500Education$13,923Animals$5,000Arts & Culture$4,185Philanthropy$2,369

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE — $51,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $5,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AQUARIUM AT UNION STATION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $2,585 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $1,923 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI APPLESEED — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGateway Men's Chorus — $1,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetST LOUIS SERVICE BUREAU — $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD OUTREACH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL LEADERSHIP INC — $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSA Educational Foundation Inc — $569 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnthropedia Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME WORKS - THVP — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AQUARIUM AT UNION STATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis
  • Who funds MISSOURI APPLESEED
  • Who funds Gateway Men's Chorus
  • Who funds ST LOUIS SERVICE BUREAU
  • Who funds CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS
  • Who funds FOOD OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds CULTURAL LEADERSHIP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centene FoundationMO21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centene Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Kahn Memorial Trust · Bodine Family Foundation Inc · Leon and Mary Strauss Charitable Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Jewish Federation of St Louis

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ray Marglous Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph