Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ransom Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$247kHuman Services$61kRecreation & Sports$59kYouth Development$44kEducation$16kPublic Benefit$12kInternational$6kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS$15,000
HEAR NASHVILLE$15,000
BRISTOL REGIONAL SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER$7,000
ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION$5,000
CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER$5,000
PROGESS INC$4,000
ACADEMY AT HICKORY HALLOW$3,000
ACADEMY AT OPRY MILLS$3,000
SIMON YOUTH ACADEMY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 9%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 9%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 16%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 16%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 16%CUMBERLAND CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 16%ABLE YOUTH: $7k → 14%PROGESS INC: $4k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $15k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $10k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $10k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $10k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$459k · 14 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$459k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+23%

Still filing today

64%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HN
    HEAR NASHVILLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $184k · revenue +58% · 41% of their budget
  • CC
    Cumberland Childrens Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +44%
  • BI
    BACKFIELD IN MOTION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $35k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MCNEILLY CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • AY
    Able Youth Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +44%
  • TF
    THISTLE FARMS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blind-Visually Impaired Early Services of Tennesse

Blind early services tn ensures that families are empowered and equipped through specialized programs of support to provide young children who are blind or low vision their absolute best start.

Youth Development
2
Michael Dunn Center

To empower individuals living with disabilities and challenges to gain independence

Human Services
3
Pacesetters Inc

To empower and support people to be valued members of society.

Human Services
4
Our Place Nashville

To empower adults with developmental disabilities by providing affordable housing, work that is meaningful and an inclusive community in which to live.

Housing & Shelter
5
Easter Seals Tennessee Inc

The mission of easterseals tennessee is to make profound positive differences in the lives of people with disabilities as they learn, work, and play in their communities.

Health
6
Access Services of Middle Tennessee

Provides support services to individuals with disabilities in the form of outreach, training education, consultants and referrals requarding use of assistive technologies.

—
7
Empower Tennessee

To promote independence for persons with disabilities and provide guidance, education, and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
9
The Bridge of Georgia School Inc

Educational facility for special needs children to help them achieve their highest possible level of success

Education
10
Mitchell's Place Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive, research-based services for children and families affected by autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. we strive to unlock the potential of individuals affected by autism…

Health
11
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
12
Park Center Inc

Park center has been serving nashville for over 40 years, providing a place for hope and recovery for people experiencing serious mental illness, homelessness, and addiction. we meet people where they are and provide support through…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridges. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEAR NASHVILLE: $184,000 · HealthHEAR NASHVILLEBRISTOL REGIONAL SPEECH & HEARING CENTER: $19,500 · HealthBRISTOL REGIONAL SPEECH & HEARING CENTERAmputee Blade Runners: $45,000 · Human ServicesAmputee Blade RunnersCumberland Childrens Center: $45,000 · Human ServicesCumberland Childrens Cente…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $11,400 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND…Able Youth Inc: $6,600 · Human ServicesAble Youth IncTUCKER'S HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesALIVE HOSPICE INC: $4,500 · Human Services+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…ACHILLES INTERNATIONAL: $13,900 · OtherACHILLES INTERNATIO…THE MCNEILLY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherTHE MCNEILLY CENTERTHISTLE FARMS INC: $5,000 · OtherTHISTLE FARMS INCSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $5,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD…SIMON YOUTH ACADEMY: $5,000 · OtherSIMON YOUTH ACADEMYACADEMY AT HICKORY HALLOW: $5,000 · OtherACADEMY AT HICKORY …ACADEMY AT OPRY MILLS: $3,000 · Other+4 more: $8,000 · Other+4 moreST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK…BACKFIELD IN MOTION: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsPENCIL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationHOMEWORK HOTLINE INC: $2,500 · EducationBRIDGES: $5,650 · International
Health$203,500Human Services$121,500Other$86,900Philanthropy$50,000Recreation & Sports$35,000Education$10,000International$5,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEAR NASHVILLE: $184,000 over 9y, 41% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmputee Blade Runners: $45,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCumberland Childrens Center: $45,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetBACKFIELD IN MOTION: $35,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBRISTOL REGIONAL SPEECH & HEARING CENTER: $19,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $11,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENCIL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAble Youth Inc: $6,600 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCKER'S HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROGRESS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWORK HOTLINE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOASIS CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEAR NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Amputee Blade Runners ↗
  • Who funds Cumberland Childrens Center ↗
  • Who funds BACKFIELD IN MOTION ↗
  • Who funds BRISTOL REGIONAL SPEECH & HEARING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds PENCIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Able Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds TUCKER'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWORK HOTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds MCNEILLY CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Nashville Predators Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · T & T Family Foundation · The Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · The James W Pickle Charitable Foundation · Patricia and Rodes Hart Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · The Dan and Margaret Maddox Fund Inc · Joe C Davis Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ransom Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ransom Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ransom Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Ransom Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ransom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph