Skip to content

· Private foundation

Randolph House of Pulaski Found

GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN NEED OF HELP TO CONTINUE PROVIDING HELP TO OTHERS IN THE COMMUNITY.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$135kHealth$73kArts & Culture$59kEducation$55kFood & Nutrition$45kCommunity Improvement$39kPublic Benefit$22kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREE CLINIC OF PULASKI COUNTY$18,000
YMCA OF PULASKI COUNTY$12,000
CALFEE COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CTR$10,000
FAIRLAWN BACKPACK PROGRAM$7,500
BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL$6,000
EMERGENCY NEEDS TASK FORCE OF PC$6,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NRV$5,000
PULASKI DAILY BREAD$5,000
AMERICAN LEGION$5,000
TG HOWARD COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
WILDERNESS ROAD REGIONAL MUSEUM$5,000
FEED MY LAMBS BACKPACK PROGRAM$5,000
PULASKI ADULT DAY AND FALL PREV CTR$5,000
CITY OF REFUGE$5,000
FINES ARTS CENTER OF THE NRV$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PULASKI ADULT DAY CARE: $10k → 14%PULASKI ADULT DAY CARE: $10k → 14%TG HOWARD COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 14%TG HOWARD COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%TG HOWARD COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%BEANS AND RICE: $3k → 14%BEANS AND RICE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$424k · 22 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$424k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+106%

Still filing today

45%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YMCA OF PULASKI COUNTY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +30%
  • CC
    CALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +118%
  • PA
    Pulaski Adult Day Service & Fall Prevention Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • NR
    NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +106%
  • CO
    CENTER OF REFUGE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TI
    TAKING IT TO THE STREETS
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pulaski Community Youth Center

PCYC mission is to engage and empower children youth and families within Pulaski County and beyond and to facilitate strong partnerships among service organizations serving youth and families

Youth Development
2
Pulaski County Human Services Inc

Pulaski county human services, inc. is people coming together to plan, to act, to create new opportunities, and to inspire a renewed vision for all assisting the low income, elderly, disabled and otherwise socially or economically…

—
3
Community Foundation of Pulaski County Properties Inc

To support the community foundation of pulaski county, inc. by accepting, purchasing, holding, disposing, and managing real and personal property for the benefit of the foundation.

Philanthropy
4
Pullaski Animal Center Inc

Facilitate the placement of stray and unwanted animals and pets; maintain an animal shelter

Human Services
5
Pulaski County Humane Society

All necessary care for stray animals and future adoption of said animals

Animals
6
Pulaski Polka Days Inc

Organize annual polka festival to educate individuals on the polish culture and to provide funding for other area non-profit groups.

Human Services
7
Performing Arts Center Inc

To provide high quality venues and performing arts for the Highlands - Cashiers community.

Arts & Culture
8
Barnesville Child Day Care Center

Child care and education

Human Services
9
Polack Adult Day Center

Provides day care facilities, meals, health monitoring, recreational and social activities for senior adults.

Human Services
10
Pocahontas County Senior Citizens Inc

To provide services to the senior citizens of Pocahontas County, West Virginia

Human Services
11
Pamlico Business Resource Center
Community Improvement
12
Pulteney Free Library

Provide public library service to area residents. Services include providing book, magazine, periodical and Internet access and public use computers as well as providing educational programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pulaski Daily Bread Inc; the most unlike its peers is T G Howard Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Free Clinic of Pulaski County Inc: $73,000 · OtherFree Clinic of Pulaski County IncYMCA OF PULASKI COUNTY: $68,000 · OtherYMCA OF PULASKI COUNTYNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCFEED MY LAMBS BACKPACK PROGRAM: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION: $20,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL: $18,000 · OtherEMERGENCY NEEDS TASK FORCE OF PC: $17,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY: $16,000 · OtherWILDERNESS ROAD REGIONAL MUSEUM: $15,000 · OtherPULASKI ADULT DAY AND FALL PREV CTR: $13,000 · OtherPULASKI DAILY BREAD INC: $13,000 · Other+13 more: $80,000 · Other+13 moreCALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCALFEE COMMUNI…FRIENDS OF THE PULASKI THEATRE LTD: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE…ADAIRE THEATRE: $4,000 · Arts & CultureADAIRE THEATREPulaski Adult Day Service & Fall Prevention Center: $20,000 · Human ServicesPulaski A…T G HOWARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesT G HOWAR…Beans and Rice Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesBeans and…COAST GUARD AUXILIARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Other$378,000Arts & Culture$64,000Human Services$41,500Public Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFree Clinic of Pulaski County Inc: $73,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetYMCA OF PULASKI COUNTY: $68,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PULASKI THEATRE LTD: $30,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPulaski Adult Day Service & Fall Prevention Center: $20,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY: $16,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetPULASKI DAILY BREAD INC: $13,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetBeans and Rice Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetADAIRE THEATRE: $4,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Free Clinic of Pulaski County Inc ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF PULASKI COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PULASKI THEATRE LTD ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Pulaski Adult Day Service & Fall Prevention Center ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICABLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds T G HOWARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PULASKI DAILY BREAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Beans and Rice Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADAIRE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD AUXILIARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

C E Richardson Benevolent FoundationVA34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: C E Richardson Benevolent Foundation · The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · Celanese Foundation · New River Valley Health Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Randolph House of Pulaski Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Randolph House of Pulaski Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Randolph House of Pulaski Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph