Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ran Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$12kPhilanthropy$11kEducation$6kInternational$3kArts & Culture$2kYouth Development$900Food & Nutrition$600Health$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$145
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
ZEKELMAN HOLOCAUST CENTER$2,000
ORT AMERICA$1,800
UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION$1,225
TEMPLE ISRAEL$1,200
YAD EZRA$500
PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA$468
PLAY FOR PINK$200
Individual grant recipient$154
CAMP MAKE-A-DREAM$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $200 → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $100 → 14%YAD EZRA: $500 → 8%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 16%DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY: $100 → 21%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $468 → 7%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $300 → 14%FORGOTTEN HARVEST: $100 → 8%HILLEL OF METRO DETROIT: $2k → 21%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $384 → 7%DAVID HORODOKER ORGANIZATION: $280 → 8%HILLEL OF METRO DETROIT: $2k → 21%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $382 → 7%DAVID HORODOKER ORGANIZATION: $280 → 8%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100 → 21%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $360 → 7%DAVID HORODOKER ORGANIZATION: $254 → 8%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $320 → 7%DAVID HORODOKER ORGANIZATION: $200 → 8%PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA: $252 → 7%DAVID HORODOKER ORGANIZATION: $180 → 8%DAVID HORODOKER ORGANIZATION: $154 → 8%CAMP MAKE-A-DREAM: $100 → 8%CARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $200 → 8%JEWISH WELFARE FEDERATION: $4k → 8%JEWISH WELFARE FEDERATION: $3k → 8%ORT AMERICA: $2k → 8%ORT AMERICA: $2k → 8%ORT AMERICA: $1k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $1k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $612 → 8%DETROIT 2 NEPAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%ORT AMERICA: $300 → 8%FRIENDS OF CAMP MAKE A DREAM: $700 → 8%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $4k → 8%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $1k → 8%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $1k → 8%CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK: $1k → 8%DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION: $118 → 8%ZEKELMAN HOLOCAUST CENTER: $2k → 8%HILLEL DAY SCHOOL: $350 → 8%EMILY STILLMAN FOUNDATION: $50 → 8%JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $50 → 8%KADIMA: $100 → 8%KADIMA: $50 → 8%DEROY TESTAMENTARY FOUNDATION: $50 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26k · 7 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$26k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-21%
+42%

Still filing today

43%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2025 · $7k
  • OA
    ORT AMERICA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • DF
    DETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +88%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CAMP MAKE A DREAM
    one grant, 2020 · $700
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
3
University of Judaism Foundation
4
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

6
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
7
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
8
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
9
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
10
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
11
Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain the broad charitable, educational and/or religious purpose of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, and the foundation as authorized in…

Philanthropy
12
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is Deroy Testamentary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEK — $7,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAAREY ZEDEKIndividual grant recipient — $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientORT AMERICA INC — $5,150 · OtherORT AMERICA INCHILLEL OF METRO DETROIT — $4,000 · OtherHILLEL OF METRO DETROITIndividual grant recipient — $1,348 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT — $1,200 · Other+12 more — $2,625 · Other+12 moreUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $6,213 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $5,100 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROITPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $2,166 · InternationalDETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · InternationalHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC — $118 · Arts & CultureHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $350 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $100 · EducationCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC — $200 · Crime & LegalPLAY FOR PINK INC — $200 · Crime & LegalFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$27,823Philanthropy$11,313International$3,166Arts & Culture$2,118Education$450Crime & Legal$400Food & Nutrition$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $6,213 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $5,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $2,166 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKADIMA — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEROY TESTAMENTARY FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMILY STILLMAN FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman FoundationMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation · Barron Family Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · William Davidson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ran Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph