Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph M Schwartz Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$59kPhilanthropy$40kReligion$15kArts & Culture$13kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$5kHuman Services$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$172k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$4,000
THE PAP CORPS$3,600
JCC OF PALM BEACH GARDENS$3,000
LARCHMONT TEMPLE$2,500
NORTON MUSEUM$2,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$536
GIFT OF HOPE$500
JAFCO$500
NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$500
HENRY MORRISON FLAGNER MUSEUM FOUNDATION$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$300
KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$300
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$250
CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY$250
WATERGRASS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TY LOUIS CAMPBELL FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%LARCHMONT TEMPLE: $3k → 9%FOLDS OF HONOR: $2k → 15%MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES (UNDER 450 EACH): $1k → 11%JAFCO: $18k → 13%JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 15%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $700 → 17%LARCHMONT TEMPLE: $3k → 9%FOLDS OF HONOR: $1k → 15%JAFCO: $8k → 13%LARCHMONT TEMPLE: $2k → 9%RAYMOND KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2k → 11%JAFCO: $3k → 13%LARCHMONT TEMPLE: $2k → 9%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%NORTON MUSEUM: $2k → 11%JAFCO: $3k → 13%LARCHMONT TEMPLE: $2k → 9%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $750 → 17%KRAVIS CENTER: $1k → 11%JAFCO: $1k → 13%LARCHMONT TEMPLE: $1k → 9%RAYMOND KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $1k → 11%RAYMOND KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $1k → 11%KRAVIS CENTER: $1k → 11%KRAVIS CENTER: $1k → 11%THE PAP CORPS: $6k → 13%GIFT OF LIFE BONE MORROW: $2k → 11%THE PAP CORPS: $5k → 13%NORTON MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $845 → 11%THE PAP CORPS: $4k → 13%THE PAP CORPS: $4k → 13%NORTON MUSEUM: $700 → 11%THE PAP CORPS: $3k → 13%THE PAP CORPS: $3k → 13%THE PAP CORPS: $3k → 13%PLAY FOR PINK: $4k → 17%THE PAP CORPS: $1k → 13%PLAY FOR PINK: $3k → 17%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BOCA REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $1k → 11%JCC OF PALM BEACH GARDENS: $3k → 11%RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY: $3k → 11%RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY: $2k → 11%HENRY MORRISON FLAGNER MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HENRY MORRISON FLAGNER MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117k · 19 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
29

Total granted

$117k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+27%

Still filing today

42%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +72%
  • PF
    PLAY FOR PINK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +44%
  • RS
    RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • JH
    JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +19%
  • TL
    TY LOUIS CAMPBELL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
11
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
12
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAFCO: $34,285 · OtherJAFCOTHE PAP CORPS: $26,450 · OtherTHE PAP CORPSLARCHMONT TEMPLE INC: $11,000 · OtherLARCHMONT TEMPLE INC+29 more: $26,348 · Other+29 moreJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthJACKSON HEALT…RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC: $4,400 · HealthRED SNEAKERS …Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $2,000 · HealthBoca Raton Re…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…TY LOUIS CAMPBELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · HealthTY LOUIS CAMP…+8 more: $2,450 · Health+8 moreRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $7,300 · Arts & CulturePLAY FOR PINK INC: $7,000 · Crime & LegalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $7,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $3,661 · PhilanthropyNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $1,000 · PhilanthropyEat Better Live Better Inc: $250 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationFIRST BOOK: $500 · Education
Other$98,083Health$16,850Arts & Culture$7,300Crime & Legal$7,000Community Improvement$7,000Philanthropy$5,011Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $7,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC: $4,400 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $3,661 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTY LOUIS CAMPBELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION: $1,070 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelping Israel Fund: $518 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEat Better Live Better Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKids Cancer Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TY LOUIS CAMPBELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Helping Israel Fund ↗
  • Who funds DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds MIZNER CC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph M Schwartz Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph M Schwartz Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ralph M Schwartz’s filings →

More from the funding graph