Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph Huiras Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$268k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$355kHuman Services$165kFood & Nutrition$145kCommunity Improvement$95kHealth$93kHousing & Shelter$92kReligion$86kArts & Culture$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL$55,000
MEL'S CHARITIES INC$30,000
L'ARCHE PORTLAND$25,000
LUMEN CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
CED PORT WASHINGTON-SAUKVILLE INC$20,000
OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
ADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE$15,000
ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL$15,000
PYRAMAX BANK FOUR BALL GOLF CH CHAR$15,000
PORTAL INC$10,000
ON-THE-MOVE$10,000
ANIMAL AID INC$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$7,500
FOUNDATION FOR RELIGOUS RETIREMENT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%L'ARCHE PORTLAND: $25k → 12%L'ARCHE PORTLAND: $10k → 12%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$1.3M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+7%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $355k · revenue +24%
  • AA
    ANIMAL AID INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +436%
  • TF
    THE FOOD PANTRY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF LACRO
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • MR
    MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Sharing of Ozaukee County Inc

To alleviate hunger and promote self-sufficiency with dignity and compassion to low-income, elderly and disabled residents of Ozaukee County.

Food & Nutrition
2
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
3
Ozaukee Nonprofit Center Inc

The Ozaukee Nonprofit Center provides a gateway through which the community can access multiple nonprofit agencies and their services at one site.

Community Improvement
4
Interchange Inc

Provide emergency food assistance to needy individuals in Milwaukee.

Food & Nutrition
5
Oconomowoc Food Pantry Inc

To provide food items to individuals and families, or anyone in need that resides within the Oconomowoc area school district, or who has an Oconomowoc mailing address.

—
6
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
7
Family Pathways

Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.

Human Services
8
Family Voices of Wisconsin Inc

Provide training and informational materials to families of children and youth with disabilities to enable them to understand and use the supports and services provided by private and public health care and community systems.

Health
9
Antigo Area Community Food Pantry

Free food pantry. The Organization distributes free food to over 100 needy families per week, totaling almost 5000 visits per year. Over 70 individual volunteers receive, organize, and distribute over 200,000 pounds of food annually.

Food & Nutrition
10
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Orchids Fasd Services Wisconsin Inc

Support organization for individuals affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum disorder. We provide advocacy, resources for individuals and family members of those with FASD. We maintain a website, provide podcast meetings, and a fall forum that…

Community Improvement
12
Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County

We provide financial and spiritual aid to the underprivileged, including rent and utility assistance, food, clothing, household items so they can meet their financial obligations caused by unexpected circumstances. We served over 46 people…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northern Ozaukee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CED PORT WASHINGTON-SAUKVILLE INC: $95,000 · OtherCED PORT WASHINGTON-SAUKVILLE INCFriends of Autism Inc: $85,000 · OtherFriends of Autism IncST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $80,000 · OtherST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEALPHAME INC: $80,000 · OtherPHAME INCBIG BROTHERSSISTERS: $75,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERSSISTERSLUMEN CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherLUMEN CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCHON-THE-MOVE: $60,000 · OtherON-THE-MOVETHE FOOD PANTRY INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE FOOD PANTRY INCASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $60,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PORTLANDPYRAMAX BANK FOUR BALL GOLF CH CHAR: $30,000 · Other+10 more: $98,500 · Other+10 moreMarquette University: $355,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityOZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesLArche Portland: $35,000 · Human ServicesANIMAL AID INC: $70,000 · AnimalsFAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY: $47,000 · Public BenefitADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE INC: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterMELS CHARITIES INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyPORTAL INC: $10,000 · Employment
Other$783,500Education$355,000Human Services$80,000Animals$70,000Public Benefit$47,000Housing & Shelter$45,000Philanthropy$30,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $355,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Autism Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 64% of budgetANIMAL AID INC: $70,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY: $47,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $45,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLArche Portland: $35,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN OZAUKEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Autism Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES OF OZAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds LArche Portland ↗
  • Who funds MELS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN OZAUKEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph Huiras Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph Huiras Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 59%
  • LArche Portland: 59% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ralph Huiras Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ralph Huiras Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ralph Huiras’ filings →

More from the funding graph