Skip to content
Rajendra and Pratibha Modi Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rajendra and Pratibha Modi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$39kReligion$31kInternational$8kPhilanthropy$7kFood & Nutrition$5kHousing & Shelter$2kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$224k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAI DISHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY$8,000
JAIN SOCIETY$1,903
JAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
ABHI SHAH FOUNDATION$500
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$250
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$250
BHARTIYA TEMPLE$100
WIKI FOUNDATION$52
CONSUMERS REPORTS FOUNDATION$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 61% of grant dollars ($62k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($39k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
OK
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 39% of all-years giving ($39k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$39k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 19 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$89k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
-6%

Still filing today

37%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +98%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +167%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -30%
  • JU
    JITO USA CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SI
    Sewa International Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sahayog Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
3
World Health Foundation
—
4
Sanjay Shah Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Wadhwani Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Samjivani Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Swaha Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Thought for Food Foundation
—
10
The Desai Foundation
Education
11
Global United Foundation
International
12
Wellness for Humanity Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jaya Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAI DISHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY: $39,000 · OtherNAI DISHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYJAIN SOCIETY: $27,623 · OtherJAIN SOCIETYMAIFS: $4,200 · Other+18 more: $11,497 · Other+18 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,900 · InternationalMEDECINS …WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CEN…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $1,550 · InternationalAMNESTY I…World Spiritual Awarness Forum Inc: $1,000 · InternationalWorld Spi…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 · InternationalUNITED ST…BLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $500 · InternationalBLIND FOU…+1 more: $100 · InternationalGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $3,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionSewa International Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesAbhi Shah Foundation: $800 · Human ServicesFederation of Jain Associations in North America: $1,100 · ReligionSWARAJ FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationJAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation: $100 · Crime & Legal
Other$82,320International$8,550Food & Nutrition$5,000Human Services$2,800Religion$1,100Education$500Philanthropy$500Crime & Legal$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $1,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFederation of Jain Associations in North America: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Spiritual Awarness Forum Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAbhi Shah Foundation: $800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Federation of Jain Associations in North America ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds World Spiritual Awarness Forum Inc ↗
  • Who funds Abhi Shah Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SWARAJ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
  • Who funds JAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rajendra and Pratibha Modi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rajendra and Pratibha Modi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rajendra and Pratibha Modi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home