Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Raise the Floor Alliance

To ensure that low-wage workers have access to quality jobs and are empowered to uphold and improve workplace standards.

$543k
Granted FY2017
9
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $497k
$69,286
Median grant
1
States reached
$556k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORKERS CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE$80,713
CHICAGO CUMMUNITY & WORKERS RIGHTS$76,816
Individual grant recipient$73,366
WAREHOUSE WORKERS FOR JUSTICE$69,286
Centro de Trabajadores Unidos$69,286
ARISE CHICAGO$69,286
Individual grant recipient$57,857
LATINO UNION OF CHICAGO$35,000
RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTER CHICAGO$11,429
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LATINO UNION OF CHICAGO: $35k → 14%Centro de Trabajadores Unidos: $69k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHICAGO CUMMUNITY & WORKERS RIGHTS — $76,816 · OtherCHICAGO CUMMUNITY & WORKERS RIGHTSIndividual grant recipient — $73,366 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAREHOUSE WORKERS FOR JUSTICE — $69,286 · OtherWAREHOUSE WORKERS FOR JUSTICEIndividual grant recipient — $57,857 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTER CHICAGO — $11,429 · OtherCENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS — $69,286 · Human ServicesCENTRO DE TRABAJADORE…Latino Union of Chicago — $35,000 · Human ServicesLatino Union of Chica…Workers Center For Racial Just NFP — $80,713 · Civil RightsWorkers Center F…ARISE CHICAGO — $69,286 · EmploymentARISE CHICAGO
Other$288,754Human Services$104,286Civil Rights$80,713Employment$69,286

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWorkers Center For Racial Just NFP — $80,713 over 1y, 10% of budgetCENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS — $69,286 over 1y, 15% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Workers Center For Racial Just NFP
  • Who funds ARISE CHICAGO
  • Who funds CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS
  • Who funds Latino Union of Chicago

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Woods Fund of ChicagoIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Woods Fund of Chicago · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Raise the Floor Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Raise the Floor Alliance?

    Find your warmest path to Raise the Floor Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph