Skip to content

· Private foundation

Radow Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$988k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$288k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$3.1MPhilanthropy$1.0MReligion$966kInternational$315kHealth$168kFood & Nutrition$108kYouth Development$106kArts & Culture$103kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $519k
  • $250k+1 grant · $288k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlant$288,000
PSI-Population Ser international$150,000
Open Doors Atlanta$100,000
FIDF$93,600
AIEF-AM Israel Education Foundation$75,000
New York Law School$50,000
KSU Hillels of Georgia$50,000
Jewish Fertility Foundation$30,000
Jewish Home Life$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Congregation ETZ Chaim$17,222
Birthright Israel Foundation$10,000
Yeka Girls$10,000
BAMAH$10,000
Jewish Kids Group$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boca West Children's Foundation: $10k → 11%Dress for Success Atlanta: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 34 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
38

Total granted

$5.2M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+26%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $278k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +81%
  • NY
    NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $158k · revenue +10%
  • HI
    HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $88k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IG
    Israel Global Intiative Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • AT
    Atlanta Technical College Foundation Incorporatedgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
2
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
5
Jewish Institute for the Blind (Jerusalem) Inc

To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.

International
6
Hillels of Georgia Inc

To engage and enrich the lives of Jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world by empowering students to build vital Jewish communities on campus and inspire them to embrace a future of…

—
7
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
10
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
11
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
12
Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society works to preserve and celebrate jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to increase awareness and deepen connections to jewish life. jfs is committed to showcasing the diversity of the jewish experience,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bamah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,631,810 · EducationKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCPLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $204,600 · EducationPLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $157,500 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationCONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM INC: $540,272 · OtherCONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM INCFIDF: $247,850 · OtherFIDFKSU Hillels of Georgia: $227,857 · OtherKSU Hillels of GeorgiaAIEF: $175,000 · OtherAIEFPSI-Population Ser international: $150,000 · OtherPSI-Population Ser internationalIndividual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherWISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC: $80,000 · Other+61 more: $717,013 · Other+61 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $815,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…+2 more: $30,000 · PhilanthropyOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $107,612 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $180 · Food & NutritionHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $88,049 · Religion+2 more: $2,000 · ReligionJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC: $19,994 · Health+1 more: $180 · HealthCOOL GIRLS INC: $43,500 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $3,600 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth Development
Education$3,013,910Other$2,257,992Philanthropy$845,500Food & Nutrition$107,792Religion$90,049Health$80,174Youth Development$48,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,631,810 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $815,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $204,600 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $157,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $107,612 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $88,049 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC: $80,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetNEW HORIZONS RESOURCES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCOOL GIRLS INC: $43,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Home Life Communities Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAMAH: $20,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $19,994 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNERANENAH INC: $17,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetAtlanta Technical College Foundation Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE ATLANTA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrothers for Life: $6,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOMENTUM UNLIMITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN - ATLANTA SECTION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAM YISRAEL CHAI INC: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLATTSBURGH COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COOL GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Home Life Communities Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BAMAH ↗
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NERANENAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Technical College Foundation Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta IncGA29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Ron and Lisa Brill Charitable Trust · The Marcus Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Frank Family Foundation Inc · Tim & Lauren Schrager Family Foundation · The Allan & Melanie Nelkin Foundation Inc · The Selig Foundation Inc · Luci and Stan Sunshine Family Foundation · The Imlay Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Radow Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Radow Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Radow Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Radow Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Radow Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph