Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

R Channing Wheeler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$298kHousing & Shelter$211kAnimals$19kCommunity Improvement$13kEnvironment$11kFood & Nutrition$9kSocial Science$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Homes With Hope$40,000
Westport Rotory Club Foundation$2,500
Aspectuck Land Trust$1,000
Connecticut Foodshare$1,000
Wildlife in Crisis$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Simply Smiles: $3k → 9%Simply Smiles: $1k → 9%SIMPLY SMILES: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$511k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$511k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+13%

Still filing today

62%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    HOMES WITH HOPE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $211k · revenue +38%
  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $125k · revenue +94%
  • WR
    WESTPORT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +567%

Funded once

  • PS
    PSYCHOANALYTIC SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • JL
    JUNIOR LEAGUE OF STAMFORD-NORWALK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +79%
  • WV
    WESTPORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westport Library Association Inc

The westport library was established for the purpose of maintaining a public library in the town of westport, connecticut. the library is committed to empowering the individual and strengthening the community through dynamic interaction…

Education
2
Westport Land Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve and protect westport massachusetts natural resources for people and nature, and to educate the public about the wise use of natural resources.

Environment
3
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
4
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
5
Norwalk Seaport Association Inc

The norwalk seaport association, inc. offers a cultural, environmental, and historical journey to the norwalk islands. the sheffield island lighthouse and the light keeper's cottage provide a unique historical and educational venue which…

Arts & Culture
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

9
Aspetuck Land Trust

Founded in 1966, Aspetuck Land Trust is a non-profit membership ogranization whose mission is to protect land forever and connect people to the natural world.

Environment
10
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
11
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
12
The North Shore Land Alliance Inc

To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior League of Stamford-Norwalk Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOMES WITH HOPE — $211,000 · OtherHOMES WITH HOPEStanford Fund For Undergraduate — $115,000 · OtherStanford Fund For Undergraduate+10 more — $29,100 · Other+10 moreTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $125,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATIONUCLA FOUNDATION — $32,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND…THE AFGHAN STRAY ANIMAL LEAGUE — $16,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC — $3,000 · AnimalsWESTPORT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF STAMFORD-NORWALK INC — $3,000 · Community ImprovementSAVE THE SOUND — $4,000 · EnvironmentSIMPLY SMILES INC — $3,750 · Human ServicesAmerican Museum of Natural History — $150 · Arts & Culture
Other$355,100Education$182,500Animals$19,000Community Improvement$13,000Environment$4,000Human Services$3,750Arts & Culture$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOMES WITH HOPE — $211,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $125,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AFGHAN STRAY ANIMAL LEAGUE — $16,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetWESTPORT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPLY SMILES INC — $3,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF STAMFORD-NORWALK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetWILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWESTPORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOMES WITH HOPE
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE AFGHAN STRAY ANIMAL LEAGUE
  • Who funds WESTPORT ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND
  • Who funds SIMPLY SMILES INC
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF STAMFORD-NORWALK INC
  • Who funds WILDLIFE IN CRISIS INC
  • Who funds WESTPORT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization R Channing Wheeler Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 28%
  • Save the Sound37% of income from government
  • Homes With Hope28% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph