· Private foundation
R&B Abbasi Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of R&B ABBASI FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $252k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AL-MAQASID | $201,200 |
| ZAYTUNA COLLEGE | $51,200 |
| LAUNCHGOOD INC | $32,460 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MASJID MUHAMMAD OF ATLANTIC CITY | $20,000 |
| AL MARHAMA | $20,000 |
| HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FUND | $10,272 |
| SEEKERSGUIDANCE INC | $7,200 |
| AL MADINA INSTITUTE | $5,900 |
| ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF CENTRAL JERSEY | $5,000 |
| THE MUSLIM PROJECT | $5,000 |
| FAWAKIH INSTITUTE | $2,150 |
| CORNERSTONE FELLOWSHIP | $2,000 |
| NEW BRUNSWICK ISLAMIC CENTER | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ZCZaytuna College Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $261k · revenue +98%
- NSNOOR-UL-IMAN SCHOOLS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +51%
- CCelebrateMercy6× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +72%
Funded once
- MIMADINA INSTITUTEone grant, 2024 · $50k
- UPUNITED PRODUCTION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- UPUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…
The mission of a mosjid is to facilitate the practice of Islam, support the spiritual growth of individuals, and contribute positively to the broader society through education, charity, and community engagement.
Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.
Islamic Scholarship Fund's mission is to support American Muslim storytelling & increase representation in fields & occupations that make public policy & influence public opinion by providing scholarships, internships, fellowships, film…
International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application
Darul Uloom is a nonprofit Islamic center that has been formed exclusively for educational and religious purposes. The center plays vital role in the lives of Muslims in the East of Saint Paul, Minnesota. The center is a place where…
The mission of Masjidullah is to establish the Holy Qur'an as the guide book for all of humanity and the life of prophet Muhammad as the example for human conduct. Masjidullah carries out its mission through programs of community service…
The foundation fosters and promote the development, knowledge and advancement of education of the teachings of the islamic religion throughout the world
The organization teaches and preaches the beliefs of Ansar of Imam al-Mahdi and valuable life lessons through outreach ministry programs to individuals and families throughout the United States.
Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Advocates and the most unlike its peers is Arts Council of Princeton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗
- Who funds NOOR-UL-IMAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds CelebrateMercy ↗
- Who funds MEDINA COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF CENTRAL JERSEY ↗
- Who funds PILLARS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Al-Marhama ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds Rahma Cemetery ↗
- Who funds SeekersGuidance Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds AL-MADINA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Taleef Collective ↗
- Who funds PENNY APPEAL USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Shakil Ahmed and Faria Abedin Family Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization R&B Abbasi Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wafa House Inc — 51% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Arts Council of Princeton — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.