· Private foundation
R & H Rosen Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $607k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
Largely a single collection — about 95% of reported assets are Real Estate Llc And Partnership Interests.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE | $50,000 |
| WASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $40,000 |
| UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON HILLEL FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH LIFE | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE | $30,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON HILLEL FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH LIFE | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $25,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $755k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -35% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $715k · revenue +16%- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE7× · 2018–2024 · $700k · revenue +123%
- HFHillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington7× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- JFJEWISH FEDERATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION - STROUM JEWISH STUDIES PROGRAMone grant, 2022 · $15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.
The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…
Derech emunah is an all girls jewish high school college prep program in seattle. derech emunah offers an innovative interdisciplinary student-centric curriculum, featuring applied studies, collabortion, differentiated learning, &…
The mission of hillel at washington university in st louis is to be a catalyst for jewish life among college students in st louis. we connect students with one another and with jewish culture and traditions through service and social…
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To assure the building and strengthening of the jewish community locally, nationally, overseas and in israel, in accordance with jewish values.
A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is The Sino Judaic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds QUEEN ANNE HELPLINE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Bike Works Seattle ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds Seattle Hebrew Academy ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle · Newman Family Foundation · Samis Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Tillie & Alfred Shemanski Testamentary Trust · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Rind Family Foundation · The Rabbi Arthur a Jacobovitz Institute · Howard and Frances Keller Family Foundation · Herman & Faye Sarkowsky Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization R & H Rosen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to R & H Rosen Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to R & H Rosen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.