Skip to content

· Private foundation

R&H Gemberling and L&P Miller Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$270kFood & Nutrition$127kYouth Development$106kRecreation & Sports$94kEducation$86kHuman Services$40k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
$93,555
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF BLUE SPRINGS STATE PARK$93,555
MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORP$23,389
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF WEST VOLUSIA: $40k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Volusi

The Organization is dedicated to the protection and welfare of all animals. It includes low cost shots, foster, adoptions, education, spay and neuter, animal rescue and pet therapy and food program.

Animals
2
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
3
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
4
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
5
Paws - Preservation of Animal Welfare & Safety Inc

The organization is a no-kill animal rescue. paws saves lives and prevents suffering by implementing the no-kill philosophy through aggressive spay/neuter programs for owned and unowned animals. this is accomplished by rescuing, fostering,…

Animals
6
Puplandia Dog Rescue

We rescue, rehabilitate and rehome dogs in danger of being homeless or euthanized. we provide all medical care including spay/neuter, microchipping & traning to help each dog successfully find its home. we provide community support to…

Animals
7
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
8
Pawz and Purrz Animal Rescue Inc

Rescue, care for and rehome unwanted animals. Bring awareness to the plight of abandoned and unwanted animals in our community.

Animals
9
Fuzzy Pawz Rescue Llc

Fuzzy Pawz is a small group of dedicated volunteers who open their homes and their hearts to unwanted dogs and cats. Our non-profit rescue does not have a facility but rather places each animal into a private home. We supply all vet care,…

Animals
10
Operation Pawpulation

The mission of Operation Pawpulation is to offer support and resources, including low-cost and no-cost spay/neuter, vaccinations and microchips in order to save lives by reducing the number of homeless pets in our community. Spaying and…

Animals
11
Caloosa Humane Society Inc

The mission of Caloosa Humane Society is to serve, shelter, and protect the homeless pets in our care. We are dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive homes for our companion animals in need. Our no-kill facility provides low…

Education
12
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pet Rescue By Judy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Engage Globally. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Second Harvest Food Bank Of: $81,896 · OtherSecond Harvest Food Bank OfMUSK OX FARM: $75,404 · OtherMUSK OX FARMMusk Ox Development Corporation: $44,779 · OtherMusk Ox Development CorporationPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $90,260 · AnimalsPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLAND…PET RESCUE BY JUDY INC: $70,164 · AnimalsPET RESCUE BY JUDY INCPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC: $33,959 · AnimalsPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INCPAGE 15 INC: $105,766 · EducationPAGE 15 INCEngage Globally: $85,558 · EducationEngage GloballyFRIENDS OF BLUE SPRING STATE PARK: $93,555 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF BLU…NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC: $40,132 · Human Services
Other$202,079Animals$194,383Education$191,324Environment$93,555Human Services$40,132

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAGE 15 INC: $105,766 over 1y, 13% of budgetFRIENDS OF BLUE SPRING STATE PARK: $93,555 over 1y, 35% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $90,260 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEngage Globally: $85,558 over 1y, 44% of budgetPET RESCUE BY JUDY INC: $70,164 over 1y, 13% of budgetMusk Ox Development Corporation: $44,779 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER OF WEST VOLUSIA INC: $40,132 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPOODLE AND POOCH RESCUE INC: $33,959 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R&H Gemberling and L&P Miller Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R&H Gemberling and L&P Miller Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to R&H Gemberling and L&P Miller Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to R&H Gemberling and L&P Miller Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R&H Gemberling and L&P Miller Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph