Skip to content

· Private foundation

Quen and Ann Rahal Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$345kHealth$69kReligion$39kAnimals$21kPublic Benefit$17kPhilanthropy$7kYouth Development$7kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$34,207
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY$17,628
JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD$10,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$7,368
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA$5,667
RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
MARIANNA HIGH SCHOOL BOARD$5,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSONS$5,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,000
PARTNERS FOR PETS ADOPTION CENTER$3,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD$2,500
PREGNANCY CENTER OF MARIANNA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FREEDOM CHURCH FIRST ASSEMNLY OF GOD: $3k → 10%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA: $5k → 12%TOYS FOR TOTS INC: $2k → 12%PARTNERS FOR PETS ADOPTION CENTER: $3k → 18%WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSONS: $5k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $6k → 19%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4k → 13%PARTNERS FOR PETS ADOPTION CENTER: $2k → 18%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 19%WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: $3k → 19%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 19%WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: $3k → 19%FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD: $3k → 19%TALLAHASSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 19%CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $45k → 18%TALLAHASSEE STATE COLLEGE: $3k → 19%Chipola College: $39k → 18%CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $34k → 18%JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 18%CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $28k → 18%CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $24k → 18%CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $22k → 18%MAIN STREET MARIANNA: $20k → 18%CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $19k → 18%Chipola College: $15k → 18%JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%PARTNERS FOR PETS: $15k → 18%JACKSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD: $14k → 18%MAIN STREET MARIANNA: $13k → 18%JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD: $12k → 18%MAIN STREET MARIANNA: $10k → 18%JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD: $10k → 18%JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD: $10k → 18%JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD: $7k → 18%RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 18%RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 18%MARIANNA HIGH SCHOOL BOARD: $5k → 18%CITY OF MARIANNA FLORIDA: $5k → 18%Evangel Worship Center: $3k → 18%Rivertown Community Church: $3k → 18%RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $3k → 18%RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $3k → 18%RIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $3k → 18%JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD: $3k → 18%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 15 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$483k
$39k

Still filing today

27%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $172k · revenue +218%
  • JH
    Jackson Hospital Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +6%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR PETS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • JC
    JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • CO
    CITY OF MARIANNA FLORIDA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TC
    TALLAHASSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $172,428 · OtherCHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCJackson Hospital Foundation Inc: $60,000 · OtherJackson Hospital Foundation IncChipola College: $53,953 · OtherChipola CollegeIndividual grant recipient: $44,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD: $43,567 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARDFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $31,086 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITYRIVERTOWN COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $22,015 · Other+26 more: $100,785 · Other+26 morePARTNERS FOR PETS: $21,000 · AnimalsUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,453 · Philanthropy
Other$528,334Animals$21,000Philanthropy$7,453

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $172,428 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetJackson Hospital Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetPARTNERS FOR PETS: $21,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,453 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHIPOLA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR PETS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quen and Ann Rahal Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quen and Ann Rahal Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • United Way of Northwest Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Quen and Ann Rahal Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Quen and Ann Rahal Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quen and Ann Rahal’s filings →

More from the funding graph