Skip to content
Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc

The greater houston quail coalition's mission is to sustain and restore huntable wild quail populations, to encourage and educate interested youth and to celebrate our quail hunting heritage in this region.

$207k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02Its granteesRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Environment$218kAnimals$148kScience & Tech$50k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$48,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$615k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH STATION$51,000
CAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$51,000
WILDLIFE HABIT FEDERATION$48,500
ROLLING PLAINS QUAIL RESEARCH FUND$26,000
BORDERLANDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE$20,500
TEXAS BRIGADES$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$385k · 4 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +136% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$385k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+136%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
AnimalsScience & TechEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +33%
  • CK
    CAESAR KLEBERG FOUNDATION FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $101k · revenue +142%
  • WH
    WILDLIFE HABITAT FEDERATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $99k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • BR
    BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue 0%
  • BB
    Bobwhite Brigade
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILDLIFE HABITAT FEDERATION: $98,500 · AnimalsWILDLIFE HABITAT FEDERATIONROLLING PLAINS QUAIL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $76,000 · AnimalsROLLING PLAINS QUAIL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONBORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20,500 · AnimalsBORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATIONTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC: $109,530 · Science & TechTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INCCAESAR KLEBERG FOUNDATION FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $101,000 · OtherCAESAR KLEBERG FOUNDATION F…Bobwhite Brigade: $10,000 · Environment
Animals$195,000Science & Tech$109,530Other$101,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC: $109,530 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAESAR KLEBERG FOUNDATION FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION: $101,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWILDLIFE HABITAT FEDERATION: $98,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetROLLING PLAINS QUAIL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $76,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetBORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $20,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBobwhite Brigade: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park Cities Quail IncAmazonsmile Foundation
Park Cities Quail IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park Cities Quail Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Tall Timbers Research Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc?

Find your warmest path to Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home