Skip to content

· Private foundation

Qcci Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kEducation$10kHuman Services$8kReligion$2kArts & Culture$1kCommunity Improvement$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATRIOT ACADEMY (TORCH OF FREEDOM F$7,500
LANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC$7,500
FLASHPOINT ARMY$7,500
SEAN FEUCHT MINISTRIES INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $2k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $500 → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $500 → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $500 → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $500 → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$82k · 7 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +147% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$82k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+147%
+53%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HORIZON INITIATIVE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $32k · revenue +225%
  • GS
    GARDEN SPOT FIRE RESCUE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $21k · revenue +21%
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HOLLAND SUMMER FEST
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • NH
    NEW HOLLAND AMBULANCE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +39%
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
2
Shepherd's Haven Ministries Inc

To provide housing and a day program for men and women with special needs. these facilities offer activities in a christian setting.

—
3
His Hope Ministries Inc

Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.

Housing & Shelter
4
Hendersonville Rescue Mission

Non-denominational christian mission whose purpose is to assist those in need of shelter, food and clothing in the henderson county, north carolina area.

—
5
New Horizons Life and Family Servic

The organization services victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse as well as their minor children. these services include counseling, shelter and financial assistance when funds permit.

Crime & Legal
6
Safe Harbor Ministry

Religious, charitable, educational

Religion
7
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
8
New Life Recovery Services
Health
9
Holland Christian Home Foundation

The holland christian home foundation, inc. (the "foundation") is a not-for-profit organization, formed to ensure and secure the economic future of the holland christian home association (the "association"), through gifts given by donors.

Education
10
The Haven Foundation

To provide management of real property, assets, and resources for the benefit of new horizons ministries, a colorado 501(c)(3) organization.

Religion
11
Healing Farm Ministries

To provide hope and opportunity to people with disabilities and their families, while teaching the community to do the same.

Recreation & Sports
12
Harbor of Hope Inc

Steadfastly providing hope for children and families through providing 24/7 support for clients and families, case management, consultation, and referrals to service providers in the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope House Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lancaster County Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORIZON INITIATIVE: $32,000 · ReligionHORIZON INITIATIVELANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 · ReligionLANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 · ReligionLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INCHORIZON: $9,500 · OtherHORIZONPATRIOT ACADEMY (TORCH OF FREEDOM F: $7,500 · OtherPATRIOT ACADEMY (TORCH OF FREEDOM …FLASHPOINT ARMY: $7,500 · OtherFLASHPOINT ARMYSEAN FEUCHT MINISTRIES INC: $7,500 · OtherSEAN FEUCHT MINISTRIES INCFRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES: $1,500 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherGARDEN SPOT FIRE RESCUE: $21,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGARDEN SPOT FIRE RES…NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $2,500 · Human ServicesNEW HOLLAND AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · HealthHOPE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $500 · Community Improvement
Religion$49,500Other$34,500Public Safety & Disaster$21,000Human Services$7,500Health$1,000Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORIZON INITIATIVE: $32,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGARDEN SPOT FIRE RESCUE: $21,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOLLAND AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HORIZON INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN SPOT FIRE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOLLAND AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Qcci Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Qcci Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Qcci Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Qcci Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Qcci’s filings →

    More from the funding graph