How much did PURCHASE AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC grant in FY2021?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of PURCHASE AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2021 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

Under $10k1 grant · $1k
$10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$50k–250k7 grants · $836k
$250k+3 grants · $1.1M

$152,956

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

PADUCAH-MCCRACKEN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$461,921
MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$332,681
MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$302,421
WEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICES INC$188,644
SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY$162,489
HELP AT HOME$152,956
BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$92,546
HICKMAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$90,794
MARSHALL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$89,138
CARLISLE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$59,163
KENTUCKY LEGAL AID$26,278
GRAVES COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$1,142

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 20%. 16% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.9M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.9M

Still filing today

46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PC
PADUCAH-MCCRACKEN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS
4× · 2018–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +46% · 36% of their budget
MC
MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS
4× · 2018–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +246% · 60% of their budget
MC
MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS
4× · 2018–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +11% · 78% of their budget

Funded once

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services

Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services

Washington County Senior Citizens

Providing meals to the senior citizens at the meal site and with home deliveries.

Human Services

Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

—

Perkins Co Senior Services Inc

To provide meals and transporation to senior citizens

Human Services

Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services

Calhoun County Senior Citizens

To provide services to elderly residents of calhoun county in order to eliminate dependence on others and eliminate or postpone nursing home placement, as well as to provide safe reliable transportation to transportation disadvantaged…

—

South Royalton Area Senior Cen

Sr citizens center providing meals and services for the elderly citizens in the area

—

Weston County Senior Services

The organization provides reduced priced meals, home delivered meals, transportation, and social activities to senior citizens. In addtion, the organization provided elderly rentals and community rentals.

Human Services

Marion County Council On Aging Inc

Services for the elderly

Human Services

Senior Citizens of Cc Area

Senior citizens center

—

Mid-Columbia Senior Center Inc

The mid-columbia senior center provides social and other beneficial services to seniors.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizens of Fulton County Inc and the most unlike its peers is West Kentucky Allied Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

6/9

Grantees still filing

9/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,991,501Human Services$2,884,442

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PURCHASE AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023

’20’21’22’23

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–23

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +86% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 610911294 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 88% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Purchase Area Development District Inc?

Find your warmest path to Purchase Area Development District Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PURCHASE AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Purchase Area Development District Inc?

More from the funding graph

PURCHASE AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Purchase Area Development District Inc?

More from the funding graph