Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Purchase Area Development District Inc

The purchase area development district (padd) offers a diverse collection of services, touching every aspect of life in the purchase region.

$2.0M
Granted FY2021
12
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$462k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Human Services$6.1MFood & Nutrition$2.4MCrime & Legal$90kHealth$12kCommunity Improvement$2k
02FY2021 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $836k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$152,956
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PADUCAH-MCCRACKEN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$461,921
MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$332,681
MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$302,421
WEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICES INC$188,644
SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY$162,489
HELP AT HOME$152,956
BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$92,546
HICKMAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$90,794
MARSHALL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$89,138
CARLISLE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS$59,163
KENTUCKY LEGAL AID$26,278
GRAVES COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$1,142
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $93k → 15%MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $333k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY: $162k → 29%BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $90k → 15%MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $256k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY: $106k → 29%BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $80k → 15%MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $302k → 19%MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $244k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY: $104k → 29%BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $75k → 15%MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $253k → 19%MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $238k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY: $100k → 29%BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $73k → 15%MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $246k → 19%MURRAY-CALLOWAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $221k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY: $90k → 29%MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $240k → 19%MAYFIELD-GRAVES COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $233k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.6M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$8.6M
$0

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Paducah-McCracken County Senio Citizens Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.8M · revenue +7% · 36% of their budget
  • WK
    WEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +55%
  • MC
    MURRAY-CALLOWAY CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +160% · 60% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Harlan County Senior Services Inc

    Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

    Human Services
    2
    Sherman County Senior Center Inc

    To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

    3
    Washington County Senior Citizens

    Providing meals to the senior citizens at the meal site and with home deliveries.

    Human Services
    4
    Harrison County Council On Aging

    Provide services & meals to the elderly.

    Human Services
    5
    Southeast Grayson Senior Center

    Senior Center facility for the local Meals on Wheels production.

    Human Services
    6
    Southside Senior Citizen Center

    Adults day care

    Human Services
    7
    South Royalton Senior Center

    Provides meals and services to senior citizens of the comunity and surrounding towns

    8
    Franklin County Senior Citizens Inc

    To keep senior citizens in their own home by providing meals, transportation, housework, yardwork, activities, health clinics, entertainment, referrals, and so forth for them.

    Human Services
    9
    Jackson County Council On Aging

    Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

    Human Services
    10
    Washington County Senior Services Inc

    To provide congregate meals, home delivered meals, transportation, and information and assistance to senior citizens of washington county, illinois.

    11
    Moscow Senior Citizens Inc

    We help between 10 and 20 Senior Citizens on a weekly basis.

    12
    Harrison County Commission On Aging Inc

    Promote participation of all citizens in health, welfare, recreational, civic cultural and education agencies and organizations of the senior citizens of the harrison county commission on aging by acting as coorinators and grantee to…

    Human Services

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Murray-Calloway Co Senior Citizens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Paducah-McCracken County Senio Citizens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    8
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Paducah-McCracken County Senio Citizens Inc — $1,750,427 · OtherPaducah-McCracken County Senio Citizens IncWEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICES — $1,437,596 · OtherWEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICESHELP AT HOME — $569,185 · OtherHELP AT HOMEMARSHALL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $564,894 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INCHICKMAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $360,742 · OtherHICKMAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INCCARLISLE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $268,760 · Other+3 more — $104,261 · OtherMURRAY-CALLOWAY CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $1,290,687 · Human ServicesMURRAY-CALLOWAY CO SENIOR CITIZENS INCMAYFIELD GRAVES CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $1,274,246 · Human ServicesMAYFIELD GRAVES CO SENIOR CITIZENS INCSENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY INC — $562,543 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY INCBALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $410,571 · Human ServicesBALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    Other$5,055,865Human Services$3,538,047

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPaducah-McCracken County Senio Citizens Inc — $1,750,427 over 5y, 36% of budgetWEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICES — $1,437,596 over 5y, 13% of budgetMURRAY-CALLOWAY CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $1,290,687 over 5y, 60% of budgetMAYFIELD GRAVES CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $1,274,246 over 5y, 78% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $564,894 over 5y, 64% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY INC — $562,543 over 5y, 88% of budgetBALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $410,571 over 5y, 79% of budgetHICKMAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $360,742 over 5y, 70% of budgetCARLISLE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $268,760 over 5y, 68% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Paducah-McCracken County Senio Citizens Inc
    • Who funds WEST KENTUCKY ALLIED SERVICES
    • Who funds MURRAY-CALLOWAY CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    • Who funds MAYFIELD GRAVES CO SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF FULTON COUNTY INC
    • Who funds BALLARD COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    • Who funds HICKMAN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC
    • Who funds CARLISLE COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Purchase Area Development District Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports $3.3M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph