Skip to content

· Private foundation

Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$163kHealth$144kEducation$111kHuman Services$15kInternational$8kArts & Culture$4kCommunity Improvement$3kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,001
Median grant
1
States reached
$531
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gopal Eco Village And Sanctuary Inc$5,700
Orlando Gurdwara Foundation$5,000
SIKH SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$2,001
Gujarati Samaj of Central Florida$1,000
HINDU SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC$501
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $5k → 8%INFINITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 53%.

Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$389k · 13 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$389k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+15%

Still filing today

46%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Health and Education for Less Privileged Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $143k · revenue -2% · 43% of their budget
  • HS
    HINDU SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $69k
  • GO
    GENERATION OM INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue -91% · 72% of their budget

Funded once

  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +41%
  • HS
    HINDU SAMAJ INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
2
University of Spiritual Research
Religion
3
Yoga Dana Foundation
Education
4
Shree Ram Seva Inc

The Corporation is organized exclusively for religious, charitable, cultural and educational purposes to promote the teachings of Sanatan Hindu Dharma. Inspiration to create this organization comes from teachings of H.H. 1008 Swami Shri…

Religion
5
Sarathi Yoga Foundation

To promote, foster, encourage, publish, teach & disseminate hindu religeous philosophy, as particularly expressed in the classical principles of yoga as taught by bhupendra s. soneji

—
6
Peace of Mind Yogic Center Inc

Lecture on Hindu and Jain Religion and Yogic Demonstrations

Religion
7
Sri Radha Bhakti

Meditation nbsp;kirtan nbsp;prasadam nbsp;bhakti nbsp;yoga nbsp;based nbsp;on nbsp;nimbarki nbsp;vaishnava nbsp;a nbsp;part nbsp;of nbsp;hindu nbsp;sanatan nbsp;dharma

Religion
8
Shri Yoganand Seva Samaj Trust Inc

Collect donations from US devotees and contribute them 100% towards welfare and charitable activities performed by Shri Yoganand Seva Samaj Trust, India

Arts & Culture
9
Vedic Preservation Initiative Chhabra

Maintened a website to document and present our research, popular vedic popularvedicscience.com. added 200 new articles and the website is now a top ranking site

Arts & Culture
10
Life Mission Corp

Yoga and cultural activities, temple services and perform the daily rituals and spiritual disciplines.

Human Services
11
Narayanastram Usa Inc

Hindu religouse and educational support

Religion
12
Shiv Mandir Inc

Held all religious hindu festivals conduct daily pooja inside the temple teach yoga and hindu way of life

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Generation Om Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yoga Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINDU SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $68,505 · OtherHINDU SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INCHINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC: $35,000 · OtherHINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INCMOTHER MIRACLE School: $28,000 · OtherMOTHER MIRACLE SchoolDHYANYOGA CENTER: $18,004 · OtherDHYANYOGA CENTERCHINMAYA MISSION: $11,002 · OtherHINDU SAMAJ INC: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO: $8,000 · Other+19 more: $43,312 · Other+19 moreHealth and Education for Less Privileged Inc: $143,000 · HealthHealth and Education for Less Pri…GENERATION OM INC: $47,500 · EducationGENERATION OM I…LIFE IN YOGA INSTITUTE INC: $17,501 · EducationLIFE IN YOGA IN…EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $18,250 · InternationalOrlando Gurdwara Foundation: $5,000 · ReligionMAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC: $2,502 · ReligionROTARY CLUB OF ORLANDO FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Community ImprovementBAPS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesINFINITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$232,823Health$143,000Education$65,001International$18,250Religion$7,502Community Improvement$6,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHealth and Education for Less Privileged Inc: $143,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetGENERATION OM INC: $47,500 over 7y, 72% of budgetHINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $18,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE IN YOGA INSTITUTE INC: $17,501 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetCHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO: $8,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF ORLANDO FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetMAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC: $2,502 over 2y, 56% of budgetINFINITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $404 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Health and Education for Less Privileged Inc ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION OM INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds LIFE IN YOGA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF ORLANDO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Gopal Eco Village and Sanctuary Inc ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Gurdwara Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds International Manav Mandir Mission ↗
  • Who funds INFINITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Puran Devi Aggarwal Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph