· Private foundation
Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| GENERATION OM INC | $10,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF ORLANDO FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| DHYANYOGA CENTER | $5,001 |
| HINDU SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC | $2,000 |
| THE VARKEY CHARITA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $1,001 |
| YOGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 23% of Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 53% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHealth and Education for Less Privileged Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $143k · 43% of their budget
- HSHINDU SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $68k
- GOGENERATION OM INC7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue -91% · 72% of their budget
Funded once
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue +41%
- HSHINDU SAMAJ INCone grant, 2019 · $11k
- HHHOLDING HANDS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Foster teachings of hindu religion
To promote, foster, encourage, publish, teach & disseminate hindu religeous philosophy, as particularly expressed in the classical principles of yoga as taught by bhupendra s. soneji
Hindu religouse and educational support
The Corporation is organized exclusively for religious, charitable, cultural and educational purposes to promote the teachings of Sanatan Hindu Dharma. Inspiration to create this organization comes from teachings of H.H. 1008 Swami Shri…
To promote peace within the communities through community service and Vedic Research related to Ayurveda and naturopathy to improve human quality of life
Meditation nbsp;kirtan nbsp;prasadam nbsp;bhakti nbsp;yoga nbsp;based nbsp;on nbsp;nimbarki nbsp;vaishnava nbsp;a nbsp;part nbsp;of nbsp;hindu nbsp;sanatan nbsp;dharma
Held all religious hindu festivals conduct daily pooja inside the temple teach yoga and hindu way of life
Lecture on Hindu and Jain Religion and Yogic Demonstrations
Maintened a website to document and present our research, popular vedic popularvedicscience.com. added 200 new articles and the website is now a top ranking site
Conducting yoga seminar and promoting yoga.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Generation Om Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yoga Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Health and Education for Less Privileged Inc ↗
- Who funds GENERATION OM INC ↗
- Who funds HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds LIFE IN YOGA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF ORLANDO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MAA DURGA SRI SAI BABA TEMPLE INC ↗
- Who funds International Manav Mandir Mission ↗
- Who funds INFINITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOGA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Puran Devi Aggarwal Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.