· Private foundation
Provident Health Foundation of Marinette/Menominee Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k37 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $424k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $158,115 |
| AURORA MEDICAL CENTER-BAY AREA | $150,720 |
| AURORA MEDICAL CENTER-BAY AREA | $115,640 |
| ST JOSEPH'S CONFERENCE MARINETTE | $24,700 |
| MARINETTE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH | $15,000 |
| NORTHLAKES COMMUNITY CLINIC | $15,000 |
| NORTHLAKES COMMUNITY CLINIC | $15,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOR THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY | $12,500 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL MARINETTE | $12,250 |
| ST JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC ACADEMY | $11,500 |
| CRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| CASA MENOMINEEMARINETTE | $9,200 |
| STEPHENSON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $7,500 |
| RIVER CITIES COMMUNITY POOL | $6,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAURORA MEDICAL CENTER BAY AREA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $12M · revenue +6%
- TLTHE LAKES COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +47%
- SJST JOSEPH CONFERENCE - MARINETTE WI OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL3× · 2023–2025 · $67k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $25k
- AHAURORA HEALTH CARE INCone grant, 2023 · $18k
- BSBEECHER-DUNBAR-PEMBINE SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2024 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide services and programs that promote wellness and independence and advocate for the life with dignity for the aging population and their caregivers.
At our senior center, our goal is to help seniors live vibrant, fulfilling lives. We aim to create a warm, welcoming place where seniors can connect, learn, and stay active. We also understand that not everyone can make it to the center,…
Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.
Youth sports
To provide shelter to the homeless community in merrill wi
Religious Programming
The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.
Education and care of mentally handicapped adults
To promote business and community growth and development and prepserve the competitive enterprise system of business.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aurora Medical Center Bay Area Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dar Boys & Girls Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AURORA MEDICAL CENTER BAY AREA INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAKES COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH CONFERENCE - MARINETTE WI OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL ↗
- Who funds CRIVITZ AREA FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds GREATER MARINETTE-MENOMINEE YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds DAR BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES CASA OF MENOMINEE-MARINETTE ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds MARINETTE COUNTY GROUP HOME ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: M & M Area Community Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Dickinson Family Inc Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Provident Health Foundation of Marinette/Menominee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Provident Health Foundation of Marinette/Menominee Inc?
Find your warmest path to Provident Health Foundation of Marinette/Menominee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.