Loading…
· Public charity
PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION
PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION is the fundraising entity for providence regional medical center everett, which is a hospital facility of providence health & services - washington, a legal entity in the providence st.
$1.1M
Granted FY2023
3
Grants
1
Communities
$941k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Health$19MHuman Services$97kYouth Development$47kOther$45k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
benefitsocialbehavioralaccess
2020
—
2021
access
2022
access
2023
access
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $250k+1 grant · $941k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
- PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON$941,128
- PROJECT ACCESS NORTHWEST$10,000
- JEAN KIM FOUNDATION$7,150
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 4 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
7
Total granted
$19M
$99k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+38%
+64%
Still filing today
100%
71%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES-WASHINGTON8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +38%
- PAPROJECT ACCESS NORTHWEST6× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +36%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY2× · 2020–2021 · $47k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- SRSANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITALone grant, 2017 · $25k
- EGEVERETT GOSPEL MISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +64%
- CHCITRINE HEALTHgraduated2× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Providence Health & Services - Oregon
See schedule o.as expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
2
Samaritan Pacific Health Services
To improve the health and well being of the community through our hospital and healthcare clinics.
Health
3
Salem Health
To improve the health and well-being of the people in the communities we serve.
Health
4
Peninsula Community Health Services of
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
Health
5
Pinnacle Health Medical Services
Pinnacle health medical services provides primary care, clinic and specialty physician services.
Health
6
Swedish Health Services
To improve the health and well-being of each person we serve.
Health
7
Serenity Care Health Group
Health
8
Northwest Community Healthcare
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."
Health
9
Presence Healthcare Services
To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.
Health
10
Sun Health Services
Sun health services supports and benefits sun health foundation, sun health senior living, banner health, and other charitable organizations. see schedule o for more information.
Health
11
Providence St Joseph Health
See schedule o.as expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
12
Sentinel Primary Care
To provide high-quality primary care services, giving generous time and personal attention to promote health through long-term relationships; to provide the same care to those with limited resources; to provide care that upholds the…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Services of Snohomish County and the most unlike its peers is Medical Teams International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$18,638,641Human Services$97,150Youth Development$47,200Other$45,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES-WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL SERVICES- HOMEAGE SENIOR SVC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ACCESS NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds CITRINE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR MARYSVILLE ↗
- Who funds HANDS FOR PEACEMAKING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRESCRIPTION DRUG ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEAN KIM FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
North Sound Accountable Community OfWA18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: North Sound Accountable Community Of · Providence Health & Services - · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JEAN KIM FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 474595766 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on JEAN KIM FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Providence General Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Providence General Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines