Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Providence General Childrens Association

To promote and contribute to the health care needs of children in the northwest region of washington.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.1MRecreation & Sports$150kHousing & Shelter$107kYouth Development$89kCrime & Legal$56kHuman Services$44kEducation$25kFood & Nutrition$20k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $130,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $151,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$80,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$567k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION$80,000
PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ARLINGTON KID'S KLOSET: $5k → 9%Arlington Kid's Kloset: $5k → 9%ARLINGTON KID'S KLOSET: $5k → 9%ARLINGTON KID'S KLOSET: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 49% of Providence General Childrens Association’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 55% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Providence General Childrens Associationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+87%

Still filing today

90%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $720k · revenue +37%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON
    4× · 2017–2020 · $198k · revenue +38%
  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $106k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • CH
    COCOON HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +74%
  • K4
    Kloz 4 Kids Arlington
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • SF
    STANWOOD-CAMANO FOOD BANK SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +87%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sea Mar Community Health Centers

Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.

Health
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska supports families with seriously ill children by providing a caring home-away-from-home at the SEattle Ronald McDonald House and operating a house and a van service in…

Health
3
Snohomish Community Food Bank

To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need

4
South Whidbey Homeless Coalition

We provide community members facing homlessness with chelter, resurces, and advoccy to create a strong and thriving widbey island.

Housing & Shelter
5
Snoqualmie Valley Shelter Services

Reclaim is a community resource providing pathways to stability, opportunity & connection.

Housing & Shelter
6
Immigrant Resources and Immediate Support

Immigrant Resources & Immediate Support supports basic human needs for immigrant families. These include medical and mental health services; housing and grocery stipends, kitchen essentials, beds, blankets and other household items; and…

Human Services
7
Women in Safe Homes Inc

Women in safe homes (wish) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing essential support services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and other violent crimes. wish is located in ketchikan and serves over 17 communities…

Human Services
8
Serenity House of Clallam County

Reduce homelessness in clallam county by providing resources for people to prevent evictions, receive funds for rental assistance, and shelters for families and adults.

Housing & Shelter
9
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
10
Mother Mentors of Whidbey Island

The mission of mother mentors is to nurture parents and caregivers of children birth to five by offering practical and emotional support. we welcome diverse family structures and support all families seeking community

Human Services
11
Cascade Women's Health

Cascade women's health provides consultations on pregnancy options, limited medical services, and education to individuals at risk for, or because of, unplanned pregnancies.

Health
12
Vision House

To provide safe and confidential transitional housing and services for homeless families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish and the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION — $720,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATIONPROVIDENCE HOSPICE & HOME CARE OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $325,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOSPICE & HOME CARE OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY+3 more — $13,150 · OtherPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON — $197,900 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEA…CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $106,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILD ADVO…Maris Place — $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentMaris Plac…+1 more — $1,600 · Youth DevelopmentCOCOON HOUSE — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING HOPE — $6,600 · Housing & ShelterDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH — $20,160 · Human ServicesARLINGTON KIDS KLOSET — $20,000 · Human ServicesWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES — $14,900 · Food & NutritionSTANWOOD-CAMANO FOOD BANK SERVICES — $5,000 · Food & NutritionReadiness To Learn — $16,000 · Education
Other$1,058,150Health$197,900Youth Development$144,600Housing & Shelter$106,600Human Services$40,160Food & Nutrition$19,900Education$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION — $720,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON — $197,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $106,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCOCOON HOUSE — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMaris Place — $37,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH — $20,160 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetARLINGTON KIDS KLOSET — $20,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetReadiness To Learn — $16,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES — $14,900 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST — $4,220 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP FIRE SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Employee Community Foundation Optum WashingtonWA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Employee Community Foundation Optum Washington · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of Snohomish County · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Evertrust Foundation · NW Childrens Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · North Sound Accountable Community of Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Providence General Childrens Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph