Skip to content

· Public charity

Project Lead the Way Inc

Project lead the way (pltw) empowers students to thrive in an evolving world.

$11M
Granted FY2019
430
Grants FY2019
39
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$27MCommunity Improvement$256kEmployment$147kPublic Benefit$117kYouth Development$105kReligion$62kHuman Services$23kInternational$19k
02FY2019 · 430 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 430 grants below total $10,334,320, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,837,295 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $502,975 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k42 grants · $310k
  • $10k–50k340 grants · $6.0M
  • $50k–250k48 grants · $4.1M
$15,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
District of Columbia Public Schools$190,974
Fort Worth Independent School District$190,000
Hawaii Department of Education$188,108
Denver Public Schools Foundation$180,000
Houston Independent School District$160,000
Hawthorne School District$152,500
West Contra Costa Unified School District$149,000
Miami-Dade County School Board$134,082
Community Unit School District 303$130,000
Oakland Unified School District$110,000
Albert Gallatin Area School District$105,000
Hempfield Area School District$95,000
Quincy Public Schools$90,000
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District$88,000
Green Dot Public Schools-CA$85,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Quincy Public Schools: $90k → 7%Middleborough Public Schools: $70k → 8%Everett Public Schools: $77k → 8%Hempfield Area School District: $95k → 10%Mount Diablo Unified School District: $122k → 9%Socorro ISD: $160k → 21%La Joya Independent School District: $80k → 27%Orange County Public Schools: $1.3M → 13%Duval County Public Schools: $70k → 14%Miami-Dade County School Board: $224k → 15%Davenport Community School District: $135k → 12%Kansas City Kansas Public Schools USD 500: $70k → 16%Appleton Area School District: $80k → 7%Neenah Joint School District: $100k → 11%Clayton County Public Schools: $110k → 15%Vigo County School Corporation: $135k → 19%Columbus City Schools: $80k → 15%Marshall County Board of Education: $135k → 18%Lafayette Parish School Board: $163k → 17%Hempfield Area School District: $75k → 10%District of Columbia Public Schools: $335k → 14%Orange County Public Schools: $303k → 13%Miami-Dade County School Board: $134k → 15%Denver Public Schools Foundation: $238k → 12%Marshall County Board of Education: $77k → 18%Big Beaver Falls Area School District: $70k → 10%Dublin Unified School District: $73k → 10%Kanuikapono Learning Center: $75k → 9%Houston Independent School District: $160k → 16%District of Columbia Public Schools: $191k → 14%Denver Public Schools: $190k → 12%Trinity Area School District: $75k → 12%Albert Gallatin Area School District: $105k → 17%Contra Costa Economic Partnership: $77k → 9%District of Columbia Public School District: $83k → 14%Southeast Polk Community School District: $90k → 10%Denver Public Schools Foundation: $180k → 12%Community Unit School District 303: $130k → 8%Fort Worth Independent School District: $190k → 11%Oakland Unified School District: $110k → 10%Bakersfield City School District: $103k → 18%Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District: $88k → 10%Boston Public Schools: $186k → 16%Aldine Independent School District: $75k → 16%Harlandale ISD: $83k → 16%Southwest Schools: $172k → 16%Hawthorne School District: $153k → 14%Green Dot Public Schools-CA: $85k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 269 repeat orgs$8.4M to everyone else

269 repeat relationships: 233 still active in FY2019, 36 since wound down; 191 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

269
248

Total granted

$20M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+89%

Still filing today

11%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONTRA COSTA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $144k · revenue +50%
  • TE
    THE EINSTEIN GROUP INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $80k · revenue +52%
  • YP
    YES Prep Public Schools Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $60k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • EL
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $172k · revenue +56%
  • LP
    Lafayette Parish School System
    one grant, 2018 · $163k
  • VC
    Vigo County School Corporation
    one grant, 2017 · $135k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Next Generation Education Dba Epic California Academy

To fulfill every student's individual potential by personalizing an educational plan that focuses on school and family partnership to achieve optimal student performance.

Education
2
The New American Academy Charter School

The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…

Education
3
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
4
Inspire Charter School - Los Angeles

Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.

—
5
Leadership Public Schools

Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.

Education
6
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
7
Pacific View Charter School

To focus on the success of each student & involve parents in the education of their children. the school is comitted to providing appropriate physical space, materials, qualified personnel, and staff development in order to guide the…

Education
8
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
9
North Columbus Preparatory Academy

North Columbus Preparatory Academy is a public, community school. We are our own school district sponsored by the St. Aloysius Orphanage (Charter School Specialists) which provides oversight and enforces academic, fiscal, and legal…

Education
10
Ambition Preparatory Charter School

Through high-quality instruction, intensive academic supports, and hard work, ambition preparatory charter school ensures that all students in kindergarten through grade eight have academic skills and self-discipline for college and life…

Education
11
Charter School for Entrepreurs

To engage students in entrepreneurial learning expierences to prepare them for career ownership.

Education
12
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholarship Prep Charter School; the most unlike its peers is Blackman Middle Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 709 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/92
Grantees still filing
72/92
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Orange County Public Schools: $1,697,773 · OtherOrange County Public SchoolsDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: $713,108 · OtherDC PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $623,338 · Other+183 more: $15,024,354 · Other+183 moreEDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP INC: $171,500 · EducationKanu I Ka Pono Inc: $90,000 · EducationGreen Dot Public Schools: $85,000 · EducationTHE EINSTEIN GROUP INC: $80,000 · EducationSMALL MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE: $75,000 · EducationKIPP CHICAGO SCHOOLS: $60,000 · EducationYES Prep Public Schools Inc: $60,000 · EducationASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $57,000 · EducationBay Area LEEDS: $50,505 · EducationBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,300 · EducationEMPOWER COLLEGE PREP: $40,000 · EducationDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $417,500 · PhilanthropyCONTRA COSTA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $143,750 · Community ImprovementSAN DIEGO REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $112,500 · Community Improvement
Other$18,058,573Education$819,305Philanthropy$417,500Community Improvement$256,250

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $417,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP INC: $171,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCONTRA COSTA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $143,750 over 2y, 12% of budgetSAN DIEGO REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $112,500 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetTHE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $91,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKanu I Ka Pono Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $85,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EINSTEIN GROUP INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSMALL MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE: $75,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetKIPP CHICAGO SCHOOLS: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYES Prep Public Schools Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $57,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,300 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEMPOWER COLLEGE PREP: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CONTRA COSTA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Project Lead the Way IncIN267.3× affinity307 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Round It Up America Inc · Save the Music Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · The George W Bush Foundation · Share Our Strength · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · I Car Education Foundation · Digital Promise Global · University of Indianapolis · Action for Healthy Kids

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project Lead the Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Lead the Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mater Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 709 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Project Lead the Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph