Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prevention Is Key Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$255kFood & Nutrition$136kHuman Services$121kPhilanthropy$44kYouth Development$37kEducation$36kRecreation & Sports$25kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIFTYFORWARD$10,000
METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
THE NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT$10,000
THE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER$10,000
THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PB$10,000
RODALE INSTITUTE$10,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$10,000
FAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
MIDTOWN FELLOWSHIPNAPIER KITCHEN T$10,000
INSPIRITUS$10,000
WHOLE KIDS OUTREACH$10,000
HEIMERDINGER FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $5k → 14%FIFTYFORWARD: $10k → 14%FIFTYFORWARD: $10k → 14%FIFTYFORWARD: $8k → 14%FIFTYFORWARD: $5k → 14%AMPUTEE BLADE RUNNERS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Prevention Is Key Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Prevention Is Key Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$582k · 21 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
8

Total granted

$582k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

62%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WK
    WHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +39%
  • RI
    Rodale Institute
    5× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +125%
  • TH
    The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $36k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SF
    SEMO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • II
    INSPIRITUS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SC
    SALVUS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
3
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
5
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
8
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
9
Brighter Bites Inc

To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Nurses for Newborns

Nurses for newborns (the organization) is a not-for-profit missouri corporation whose purpose is to provide home-based services to promote the health, safety, and well-being of babies and their families. the organization has two branches…

Human Services
11
Midtown Health Center

Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and dental services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.

Health
12
Church Health Center of Memphis Inc

The mission is to reclaim the Church's biblical commitment to care for our bodies and spirits. Our ministries provide essential healthcare for the working uninsured and those who would otherwise be unable to afford it.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Family Medical Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Learning Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $64,610 · OtherNURSES FOR NEWBORNSMIDTOWN FELLOWSHIPNAPIER KITCHEN T: $30,000 · OtherMIDTOWN FELLOWSHIPNAPIER KITCHEN TTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PB: $27,362 · OtherTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · OtherST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INCMETROPOLITAN NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $16,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLSYMCA: $15,000 · OtherYMCAPREVENTATIVE CARE INITIATIVE: $15,000 · OtherPREVENTATIVE CARE INITIATIVELEARNING LAB: $14,990 · OtherLEARNING LABSEMO FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TN: $10,000 · OtherINSPIRITUS INC: $10,000 · OtherBLIND-VISUALLY IMPAIRED EARLY SERVI: $10,000 · OtherNASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherInspiritus Inc: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $10,000 · OtherFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $55,000 · HealthFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL C…The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $36,000 · HealthThe Heimerdinger Found…THE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER: $35,000 · HealthTHE NEW BEGINNINGS CEN…SALVUS CENTER INC: $8,000 · HealthSALVUS CENTER INC+1 more: $2,550 · HealthRodale Institute: $40,000 · Food & NutritionRodale Institut…NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionNASHVILLE FOOD …SOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC: $20,220 · Food & NutritionSOUTHEAST MISSO…WHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC: $75,000 · Crime & LegalWHOLE KIDS O…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $39,021 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySENIOR CITIZENS INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesAmputee Blade Runners: $10,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF POPLAR BLUFF: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$277,962Health$136,550Food & Nutrition$90,220Crime & Legal$75,000Philanthropy$44,021Human Services$43,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $55,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetRodale Institute: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $39,021 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $36,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER: $35,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS INC: $33,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC: $20,220 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNING LAB: $14,990 over 2y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF POPLAR BLUFF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInspiritus Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmputee Blade Runners: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSALVUS CENTER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRAPHAH INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CONCERN CENTER OF BUTLER COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHOLE KIDS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING LAB ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF POPLAR BLUFF ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Inspiritus Inc ↗
  • Who funds Amputee Blade Runners ↗
  • Who funds SALVUS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CONCERN CENTER OF BUTLER COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hca Healthcare FoundationTN23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Memorial Foundation Inc · Joe C Davis Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · The Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital · Saint Thomas West Hospital · The Melkus Family Foundation · Dettwiller Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prevention Is Key Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prevention Is Key Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prevention Is Key’s filings →

    More from the funding graph