Skip to content

· Public charity

Prevent Child Abuse Virginia

To advance programs, practices, and policies that nurture children, empower families, and support communities.

$4.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$902k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$12MHuman Services$7.4M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $234k
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.2M
$326,973
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM$901,501
NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$655,478
CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP$516,058
CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$413,943
FAMILY LIFELINE$368,005
PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA$326,973
UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY AND MARTINSVILLE$260,000
GAINESVILLE HAYMARKET ROTARY FOUNDATION$259,834
LIBERATION$259,068
VIRGINIA ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC$251,006
QUIN RIVERS INC DBA THRIVE VIRGINIA$233,784
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $928k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%QUIN RIVERS INC DBA THRIVE VIRGINIA: $246k → 9%QUIN RIVERS INC DBA THRIVE VIRGINIA: $234k → 9%QUIN RIVERS INC DBA THRIVE VIRGINIA: $49k → 9%VIRGINIA ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC: $251k → 22%VIRGINIA ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC: $148k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 11 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$19M
$13k

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +71% · 41% of their budget
  • NR
    NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +56%
  • CH
    CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +5% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS PARKS & RECREATION
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chip of Virginia

Chip of virginia administers and monitors a network of 7 agencies in 27 virginia localities who work with low-income families to assure that children from birth to age 6 receive the health care necessary for them to lead healthy lives,…

—
2
Habitat for Humanity Virginia

Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development

Housing & Shelter
3
Virginias House a Family Resource Center
Human Services
4
Virginia Child Care Resource and Referral Network

Contracts with child care resource agencies to provide assistance to working parents in locating and identifying child care programs and to collect, maintain, and disseminate

—
5
Virginia Early Childhood Foundation

Vecf is the non-partisan steward of virginia's promise for early childhood success.

Education
6
Prevent Child Abuse Virginia

To advance programs, practices, and policies that nurture children, empower families, and support communities.

—
7
Little Hands Virginia Inc

Little hands virginia's mission is to ensure young children in need in central virginia have essentials from day one to improve outcomes for life.

Human Services
8
Help and Emergency Response

To provide shelter and to engage in dedicated efforts to eliminate domestic violence. the organization provides advocacy, support, and education to those who have been affected by domestic violence in the cities of chesapeake and…

Human Services
9
Rooftop of Virginia Cap

Combat poverty by focusing on increasing self-sufficiency of low-income citizens.

Community Improvement
10
Central Virginia Housing Coalition

Central virginia housing coalition improves the regional quality of life by providing affordable housing opportunities to low income families through coalition, education, counseling, and financial assistance.

—
11
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
12
Fauquier Community Action Committee Inc

The organization seeks to reduce poverty, revitalize low income communities and empower low income individuals and families to become self-sufficient.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Incorporated of Virginia; the most unlike its peers is Liberation Veteran Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $3,010,480 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INCCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $2,848,181 · OtherCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEYCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,513,199 · OtherCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INCCHILDREN'S HEALTH INVOLVING PARENTS: $2,401,161 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTH INVOLVING PARENTSPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $2,087,391 · OtherPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA+2 more: $437,209 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC: $4,196,709 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH INVEST…Quin Rivers Incorporated: $529,224 · Human ServicesVIRGINIAS ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC: $398,854 · Human ServicesLIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC: $555,030 · Housing & ShelterGainesville-Haymarket Rotary Foundation Inc: $429,754 · Philanthropy
Other$13,297,621Health$4,196,709Human Services$928,078Housing & Shelter$555,030Philanthropy$429,754

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC: $4,196,709 over 8y, 41% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $3,010,480 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $2,848,181 over 8y, 34% of budgetCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,513,199 over 8y, 26% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $2,087,391 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetLIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC: $555,030 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetQuin Rivers Incorporated: $529,224 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetGainesville-Haymarket Rotary Foundation Inc: $429,754 over 2y, 52% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY & MARTINSVILLE: $423,800 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetVIRGINIAS ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC: $398,854 over 2y, 98% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Quin Rivers Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Gainesville-Haymarket Rotary Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY & MARTINSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIAS ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prevent Child Abuse Virginia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prevent Child Abuse Virginia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prevent Child Abuse Virginia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph