· Public charity
Prevent Child Abuse Virginia
To advance programs, practices, and policies that nurture children, empower families, and support communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k1 grant · $234k
- $250k+10 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM | $901,501 |
| NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY | $655,478 |
| CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP | $516,058 |
| CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP | $413,943 |
| FAMILY LIFELINE | $368,005 |
| PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA | $326,973 |
| UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY AND MARTINSVILLE | $260,000 |
| GAINESVILLE HAYMARKET ROTARY FOUNDATION | $259,834 |
| LIBERATION | $259,068 |
| VIRGINIA ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC | $251,006 |
| QUIN RIVERS INC DBA THRIVE VIRGINIA | $233,784 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $928k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC8× · 2018–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +71% · 41% of their budget
- NRNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +56%
- CHCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY8× · 2018–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +5% · 34% of their budget
Funded once
- COCITY OF NEWPORT NEWS PARKS & RECREATIONone grant, 2018 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chip of virginia administers and monitors a network of 7 agencies in 27 virginia localities who work with low-income families to assure that children from birth to age 6 receive the health care necessary for them to lead healthy lives,…
Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development
Contracts with child care resource agencies to provide assistance to working parents in locating and identifying child care programs and to collect, maintain, and disseminate
Vecf is the non-partisan steward of virginia's promise for early childhood success.
To advance programs, practices, and policies that nurture children, empower families, and support communities.
Little hands virginia's mission is to ensure young children in need in central virginia have essentials from day one to improve outcomes for life.
To provide shelter and to engage in dedicated efforts to eliminate domestic violence. the organization provides advocacy, support, and education to those who have been affected by domestic violence in the cities of chesapeake and…
Combat poverty by focusing on increasing self-sufficiency of low-income citizens.
Central virginia housing coalition improves the regional quality of life by providing affordable housing opportunities to low income families through coalition, education, counseling, and financial assistance.
The organization seeks to reduce poverty, revitalize low income communities and empower low income individuals and families to become self-sufficient.
Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Incorporated of Virginia and the most unlike its peers is Liberation Veteran Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Quin Rivers Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Gainesville-Haymarket Rotary Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF HENRY COUNTY & MARTINSVILLE ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIAS ONE CHURCH ONE CHILD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prevent Child Abuse Virginia funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.