Skip to content

· Private foundation

Precision Rubber Products Foundatio

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$305kHuman Services$278kHealth$79kYouth Development$40kHousing & Shelter$33kCrime & Legal$32kRecreation & Sports$28kReligion$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,000
WILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL$5,000
CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY$4,600
SHERRY'S HOPE$4,600
WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER$4,600
BROOKS HOUSE$4,600
BOOKS FROM BIRTH$4,600
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,600
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$4,600
BIG BROTHERS$4,000
CASA$4,000
EMPOWER ME CENTER$4,000
CEDAR SENIORS$4,000
LEBANON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER$4,000
COMPASSIONATE HANDS INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%EMPOWER ME CENTER: $4k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%EMPOWER ME CENTER: $2k → 7%EMPOWER ME CENTER: $2k → 7%EMPOWER ME CENTER: $2k → 7%EMPOWER ME CENTER: $2k → 7%WILSON CO COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $5k → 7%WILSON CO COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $5k → 7%WILSON CO COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $5k → 7%WILSON CO COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $5k → 7%WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $5k → 7%LEBANON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 7%WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $4k → 7%WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $4k → 7%WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $4k → 7%WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $4k → 7%LEBANON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $3k → 7%LEBANON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $3k → 7%LEBANON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$795k · 40 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
6

Total granted

$795k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+199%

Still filing today

38%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +116%
  • WC
    WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +77%
  • SH
    SHERRY'S HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHURCH MISSIONS NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +199%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Church Homes

Cch builds and manages quality affordable housing in caring communities.

—
2
Christian Cooperative Ministry Inc

To provide food and clothing for the residents in madison, tennessee and surrounding davidson county residents that are in need. we also provide sack lunches to the homeless in the area.

—
3
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
4
Hill Country Medical Ministriesinc

To provide high-quality patient-centered services that support healthy living among the uninsured and the under-served families in the greater williamson county.

—
5
Christian Healthcare Centers Inc

Christian Healthcare Centers provides affordable, quality and comprehensive healthcare services to the body of Christ and the community.

Health
6
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
7
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
8
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
9
Christian Service Center Inc

Service to low income and homeless

Human Services
10
Christian Counseling Center of Cumb Co

To provide professional counseling

Health
11
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
12
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $60,600 · OtherCUMBERLAND UNIVERSITYTENNESSEE TECH UNIVERSITY: $49,500 · OtherTENNESSEE TECH UNIVERSITYBROOKS HOUSE: $42,600 · OtherBROOKS HOUSERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $36,600 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEBOOKS FROM BIRTH INC: $36,600 · OtherBOOKS FROM BIRTH INCHabitat for Humanity: $32,600 · OtherHabitat for HumanityJOSEPH'S STOREHOUSE: $28,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS: $28,000 · OtherCEDAR SENIORS INC: $28,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $19,500 · Other+29 more: $178,900 · Other+29 moreWILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $45,000 · Human ServicesWILSON COUNTY CHR…WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $40,600 · Human ServicesWILSON COUNTY COM…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR P…Lebanon Senior Citizens Center: $13,000 · Human ServicesLebanon Senior Ci…EMPOWER ME CENTER A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $12,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER ME CENTER…SHERRY'S HOPE INC: $40,600 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 · HealthCASA INC: $32,000 · Civil RightsFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentCompassionate Hands Inc: $12,000 · Housing & ShelterCHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK: $5,685 · Religion
Other$560,900Human Services$130,600Health$58,600Civil Rights$32,000Youth Development$28,000Housing & Shelter$12,000Religion$5,685

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $60,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL: $45,000 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetWILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $40,600 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSHERRY'S HOPE INC: $40,600 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBOOKS FROM BIRTH INC: $36,600 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $32,600 over 8y, 9.1% of budgetCASA INC: $32,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCEDAR SENIORS INC: $28,000 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $28,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLebanon Senior Citizens Center: $13,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCompassionate Hands Inc: $12,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEMPOWER ME CENTER A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $12,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIWASSEE COLLEGE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK: $5,685 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COUNTY CHRISTMAS FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHERRY'S HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FROM BIRTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR SENIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Lebanon Senior Citizens Center ↗
  • Who funds Compassionate Hands Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER ME CENTER A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIWASSEE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH MISSIONS NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Evelyn S & Jim Horne Hankins FndTN22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Evelyn S & Jim Horne Hankins Fnd · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Robert E & Jenny D Kirkland Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Precision Rubber Products Foundatio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Precision Rubber Products Foundatio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Precision Rubber Products Foundatio?

Find your warmest path to Precision Rubber Products Foundatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Precision Rubber Products Foundatio’s filings →

More from the funding graph