Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pratt Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$248kHealth$196kPhilanthropy$195kCommunity Improvement$46kCrime & Legal$42kYouth Development$38kArts & Culture$34kReligion$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC$18,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$16,500
Individual grant recipient$16,000
MORLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$15,000
YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$10,500
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA ASSN$10,000
ATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,000
ATCHISON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
ATCHISON AREA UNITED WAY$5,000
THEATRE ATCHISON INC$1,500
ATCHISON HOSPITAL AUXILIARY$1,000
ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION$1,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-LEWIS & CLARK CNCL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $33k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $31k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $31k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $30k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $20k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $20k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $11k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $11k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$728k · 25 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
10

Total granted

$728k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+226%

Still filing today

52%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $172k · revenue +417%
  • TA
    THEATRE ATCHISON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +185%
  • AA
    ATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • F-
    FOCUS -FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-LEWIS & CLARK
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atchison Community Health Clinic Inc

Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.

Health
2
Atchison Area Economic Development Corporation Inc

To maintain real estate for the economic development of atchison county, kansas. to provide resources and assistance for continued economic development in atchison county, kansas.

Education
3
Pittsburg Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote the Pittsburg, Kansas business community.

—
4
Axtell Community Fitness Center Inc

To offer services that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all community members to achieve health, gain confidence and make connections.

Recreation & Sports
5
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
6
Atchison Community Educational Foundation

Provide funds for the education of at-risk students in the atchison, kansas area

Philanthropy
7
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
8
Atchison Art Association

To promote the understanding and value of art through education, exhibitions and outreach.

—
9
Kansas Alpha of Phi Delta Theta Educational Foundation
—
10
Kansas Hospital Association

The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.

—
11
Project Atchison Inc

The purpose of project atchison, inc. is to promote a more enjoyable and promising atchison for today and future generations. leading by example we strive to bring about communitywide change through hard work, advocacy, commitment, and…

Community Improvement
12
Kansas Cooperative Council

The kansas cooperative council exists to promote, support and advance the interests, business success, and understanding of agricultural, utility, credit and consumer cooperatives and their members through legislation and regulatory…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live Well Live Atchison Inc; the most unlike its peers is Benedictine College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF: $31,450 · OtherATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OFATCHISON AREA UNITED WAY: $28,800 · OtherATCHISON AREA UNITED WAYFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $26,300 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCASA ASSOCIATION: $23,000 · OtherCASA ASSOCIATIONTHEATRE ATCHISON INC: $18,000 · OtherTHEATRE ATCHISON INCCITY OF ATCHISON: $17,000 · OtherCITY OF ATCHISONIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15,000 · OtherATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEATCHISON COUNTY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $14,000 · OtherALL FAITH COUNSELING CENTER: $10,800 · Other+13 more: $47,400 · Other+13 moreHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC: $172,000 · HealthHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INCValley Hope Association Foundation: $10,000 · HealthAMBERWELL ATCHISON VOLUNTEERS INC: $9,500 · Health+1 more: $4,500 · HealthYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $190,750 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN AS…MORLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · PhilanthropyMORLAND COMMUNITY FOU…ATCHISON FOUNDATION: $60,500 · PhilanthropyATCHISON FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFirst Judicial District CASA Association: $41,500 · Civil RightsGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentPONY EXPRESS COUNCIL-BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentBenedictine College: $4,400 · EducationATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · Education
Other$262,750Health$196,000Human Services$190,750Philanthropy$166,500Civil Rights$41,500Youth Development$14,000Education$8,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $190,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC: $172,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetMORLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetATCHISON FOUNDATION: $60,500 over 5y, 51% of budgetFirst Judicial District CASA Association: $41,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTHEATRE ATCHISON INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetValley Hope Association Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMBERWELL ATCHISON VOLUNTEERS INC: $9,500 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPONY EXPRESS COUNCIL-BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIVE WELL LIVE ATCHISON INC: $4,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetBenedictine College: $4,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetATCHISON ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 34% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds MORLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds First Judicial District CASA Association ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Valley Hope Association Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMBERWELL ATCHISON VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS COUNCIL-BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LIVE WELL LIVE ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Courtney S Turner Charitable TrustTX26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Courtney S Turner Charitable Trust · Guy I Bromley Residuary Trust · Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Atchison United Way Board · Cloud L Cray Foundation · The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation · Adair-Exchange Bank Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pratt Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pratt Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pratt Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pratt Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pratt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph