Skip to content

Wisconsin · Private foundation

Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
15%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$49,236
Organizations funded a year
13 to 16
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.4M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 15% of the organizations Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$100k10%
FY202413$175k15%
FY202315$403k7%
FY202215$547k7%
FY202116$2.7M19%
FY202013$1.3M15%
FY201916$1.1M31%
FY201814$2.5M36%
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.6MRecreation & Sports$2.1MEnvironment$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.7MEducation$1.1MCommunity Improvement$144kAnimals$103kYouth Development$95kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ice Age Trail Alliance Inc$797,500416%
Carroll University Inc$705,00030%
Friends of Kickapoo Valley Reserve Inc$427,500360%
Notre Dame School of Milwaukee Inc$256,4563n/a
Central Conservation Inc$122,73662%
International Crane Foundation Inc$103,00070%
All Hands Boatworks Inc$93,50096%
Discovery World Ltd$90,80031%
Harbor District Inc$82,50074%
Taliesin Preservation Inc$78,50052%
Show all 24 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($6.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIce Age Trail Alliance Inc: $797,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetCarroll University Inc: $705,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of Kickapoo Valley Reserve Inc: $427,500 over 3y, 60% of budgetCentral Conservation Inc: $122,736 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetInternational Crane Foundation Inc: $103,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAll Hands Boatworks Inc: $93,500 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetDiscovery World Ltd: $90,800 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHarbor District Inc: $82,500 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetTaliesin Preservation Inc: $78,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetMilwaukee Riverkeeper Inc: $65,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetMenomonee Valley Partners Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetMilwaukee Parks Foundation Inc: $52,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGathering Waters Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEarthjustice: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRiveredge Nature Center Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJuneau Park Friends Inc: $18,000 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetHighland Community School Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLake Park Friends Ltd: $10,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWisconsin Philanthropy Network Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Outing Association: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI31.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · R a Stevens Family Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Gardner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust

How much does Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust give?
Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust reported 10 grants totaling $99,692 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (27%), Recreation & Sports (21%), Environment (18%).
Who are Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Ice Age Trail Alliance Inc ($798k), Carroll University Inc ($705k), Friends of Kickapoo Valley Reserve Inc ($428k).
Does Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 15% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc, Baird Foundation Inc, Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc.
Where is Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust based?
Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein Charitable Trust is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prairie Springs Paul Fleckenstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph