Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prado and Renteria Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$52kCommunity Improvement$31kHuman Services$5kScience & Tech$3kCrime & Legal$2kHousing & Shelter$2kArts & Culture$750Employment$700Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $800
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$276k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Institute for Growth & Development$10,000
Individual grant recipient$500
CPA Endowment Fund of Illinois$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GoFoundme: $25 → 7%Latino Business Action Network: $250 → 8%FLAP: $700 → 14%University of Illinios Foundation: $25k → 19%Latino Business Action Network: $250 → 8%Alianza Americas: $200 → 14%Latino Business Action Network: $12 → 8%FLAP: $500 → 14%Alianza Americas: $200 → 14%FLAP: $500 → 14%St Agnes of Bohemia School: $150 → 14%FLAP: $500 → 14%St Agnes of Bohemia School: $100 → 14%Women Bussiness Development Center: $300 → 14%Women Bussiness Development Center: $300 → 14%Institute for Growth & Development: $10k → 14%Institute for Growth & Development: $5k → 14%Institute for Growth & Development: $5k → 14%Institute for Growth & Development: $5k → 14%Institute for Growth & Development: $5k → 14%Illinois CPAs Endowment Fund of Illinois: $1k → 14%CPA Endowment Fund of Illinois: $300 → 14%Instituto del Progreso Latino: $25k → 14%The Resurrection Project: $500 → 14%The Resurrection Project: $500 → 14%The Resurrection Project: $500 → 14%Sones de Mexico Ensemble: $250 → 14%Sones de Mexico Ensemble: $250 → 14%Sones de Mexico Ensemble: $250 → 14%St Puis V: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 7 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +130% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$36k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+130%
+57%

Still filing today

71%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT
    5× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +54%
  • TR
    The Resurrection Project
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +213%
  • SD
    SONES DE MEXICO ENSEMBLE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $750 · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • University of Illinois Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +57%
  • ID
    Instituto del Progreso Latino
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • AD
    Asociacion De Desarrollo Y Crecimiento Ontologico Integral
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Leadership Institute

By 2050, Latinos will comprise nearly 30 of the US population. Today and in the future, the demographic destiny of the U.S will be characterized by the growing Latino population. In fact, Latinos have an impact in all aspects of life. We…

Arts & Culture
2
The Chicago Network Inc

In furtherance of its charitable and educational goals, the Network's activities consist primarily of providing educational opportunities for its members and the public on issues related to the advancement of women in the workplace. As the…

Community Improvement
3
Illinois Business Alliance

The illinois business alliance is a nonprofit, member-driven business league that exists to improve illinois' business climate and promote the common economic interests of its members.

—
4
Illinois Center for Employee Ownership

The Illinois Center for Employee Ownership is the state's leading resource for education, guidance and support on employee ownership.

Community Improvement
5
Latino Economic Development Center

To transform our community by creating economic opportunities for Latinos across the state of Minnesota. We provide a structure, support system and tool with which to promote sustainable communities.

Housing & Shelter
6
Multicultural Women Executive Leadership Foundation

The Multicultural Women Executive Leadership Foundation is a non-profit organization that offers leadership and entrepreneurship training and development for multicultural women and men. Its focus is on strengthening the US economic…

Education
7
Illinois Venture Capital Association

The Illinois Venture Capital Association (The "Association) was incorporated on July 27, 2000, to foster development and growth of business enterprise, which will enhance the vitality of the Illinois venture capital and private equity…

Community Improvement
8
Latino Corporate Directors Association

Lcda serves as an advocate and resource to corporate boards, search firms, private equity, and institutional investors interested in gaining access to exceptional latino board talent.

Education
9
Illinois Unidos

Champion equitable responses and recovery efforts for the Latinx community impacted by COVID-19

Community Improvement
10
Alianza Leadership Institute

The Alliance of the SouthEast (ASE) builds the capacity of leaders, organizers, and associations that carry out community and social change. We envision a powerful grassroots base that impacts decision makers and wins real improvements in…

Human Services
11
Elgin Area Chamber of Commerce

The Elgin Area Chamber connects communities through engagement, advocacy, collaboration, and leadership.

Community Improvement
12
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Business Development Center; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Growth & Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INSTITUTE FOR GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT: $30,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR GROWTH & DEVELOPMENTInstituto del Progreso Latino: $25,000 · OtherInstituto del Progreso LatinoAsociacion De Desarrollo Y Crecimiento Ontologico Integral: $3,000 · Other+16 more: $10,125 · Other+16 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Founda…+1 more: $300 · EducationThe Resurrection Project: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterSONES DE MEXICO ENSEMBLE: $750 · Arts & CultureLATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK INC: $512 · Community ImprovementAlianza Americas: $400 · International
Other$68,125Education$25,300Housing & Shelter$1,500Arts & Culture$750Community Improvement$512International$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT: $30,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSONES DE MEXICO ENSEMBLE: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK INC: $512 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlianza Americas: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCPA ENDOWMENT FUND OF ILLINOIS: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds SONES DE MEXICO ENSEMBLE ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LATINO BUSINESS ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Alianza Americas ↗
  • Who funds CPA ENDOWMENT FUND OF ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prado and Renteria Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prado and Renteria Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Prado and Renteria Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Prado and Renteria Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prado and Renteria’s filings →

    More from the funding graph