Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc

To promote and enhance the development of competent, compassionate, and committed medical practitioners and leaders to provide goal-centered care across all post-acute and long-term care settings.

$465k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$1.8M
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $201k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $258k
$37,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVERA HEALTH$100,000
HOMAHA SENIOR CARE LLC$90,000
ALG SENIOR$67,500
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC$41,250
THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY$37,500
AVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INC$37,500
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC$37,500
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$29,717
UPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC$17,500
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$6,244
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $113k → 9%THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY: $38k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

SD
OH
PA
UT
NE
MD
NC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 2% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 11 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$1.5M
$295k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-2%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    Avera Health
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +26%
  • TE
    THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +6%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR POST-ACUTE AND LONG TERM CARE MEDICINE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $39k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • PA
    POST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $113k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $113k
  • TC
    TRANSITIONAL CARE PHYSICIANS OF GEORGIA
    one grant, 2023 · $70k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALG SENIOR — $262,500 · OtherALG SENIORSABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC — $165,000 · OtherSABER HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCHOMAHA SENIOR CARE LLC — $165,000 · OtherHOMAHA SENIOR CARE LLCAVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INC — $150,000 · OtherAVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INCGeorge Mason University - Cashier's Office — $150,000 · OtherGeorge Mason University - Cashier's OfficePOST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $112,500 · OtherPOST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $112,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRANSITIONAL CARE PHYSICIANS OF GEORGIA — $70,000 · OtherTRANSITIONAL CARE PHYSICIANS OF GEORGIAMIAMI UNIVERSITY — $58,851 · OtherUPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC — $212,500 · HealthUPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIE…Avera Health — $150,000 · HealthAvera HealthTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE EVANG…THE FOUNDATION FOR POST-ACUTE AND LONG TERM CARE MEDICINE — $39,010 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $31,227 · Education
Other$1,246,351Health$362,500Human Services$150,000Education$70,237

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC — $212,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAvera Health — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $112,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR POST-ACUTE AND LONG TERM CARE MEDICINE — $39,010 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $31,227 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPMC SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds Avera Health
  • Who funds THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
  • Who funds POST-ACUTE AND LONG-TERM CARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR POST-ACUTE AND LONG TERM CARE MEDICINE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc?

Find your warmest path to Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medical Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph