Skip to content

· Private foundation

Posey-Glickert Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$703kEducation$224kHuman Services$221kYouth Development$70kHousing & Shelter$47kArts & Culture$45k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $183k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$40,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
BRIDGEYEAR$20,000
NIH FOUNDATION$20,000
ANY BABY CAN$18,000
UT DALLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$15,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA - HOUSTON$10,000
PRELUDE MUSIC FOUNDATION$10,000
ANN RICHARDS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
HOPE AND HEALING CENTER$10,000
THE SUMMER INSTITUTE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $10k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $10k → 10%BRIDGEYEAR: $20k → 16%BRIDGEYEAR: $17k → 16%BRIDGEYEAR: $15k → 16%BRIDGEYEAR: $13k → 16%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $8k → 10%BRIDGEYEAR: $5k → 16%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $5k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $5k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$25k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Ann Richards School Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +41%
  • B
    BRIDGEYEAR
    5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +274%
  • MD
    MANOS DE CRISTO INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • N
    NIH
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
2
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
3
Made Houston

MADE Houston was formed to create a school community focused on nurturing and developing the unique academic and social needs of students with learning differences and to successfully transition students into mainstream schools.

Education
4
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
5
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
6
Bridges Academy Austin

Bridges academy austin is an exceptions school for exceptional learners. our mission is to help students maximize their potential through evidence-based instructions and intervention.

Education
7
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
8
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
9
Foundation Preparatory Academy

Provide a college-preparatory education in a christian environment through a university-model-school - a blend of traditional public and private schools and home schools. currently kindergarten - 12th grade.

Education
10
Wonderworks

Wonderworks educates students to become better-qualified college applicants and better equipped to succeed in undergraduate studies by exploring challenging subject matter and techniques in a college setting.

Education
11
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
12
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prelude Music Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $225,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAYO CLINIC: $180,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICNIH FOUNDATION: $135,000 · OtherNIH FOUNDATIONUT DALLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $118,000 · OtherUT DALLAS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIESANY BABY CAN: $113,000 · OtherANY BABY CANMANOS DE CRISTO INC: $65,000 · OtherMANOS DE CRISTO INCCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $47,000 · Other+3 more: $45,000 · OtherTeach for America Inc: $87,000 · EducationTeach for America I…The Ann Richards School Foundation: $80,000 · EducationThe Ann Richards Sc…MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $42,000 · EducationMAINSPRING SCHOOLS …THE SUMMER INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE SUMMER INSTITUT…BRIDGEYEAR: $70,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEYEA…THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE: $42,500 · Human ServicesTHE REFUG…PRELUDE MUSIC FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$928,050Education$224,000Human Services$112,500Arts & Culture$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeach for America Inc: $87,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ann Richards School Foundation: $80,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetBRIDGEYEAR: $70,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMANOS DE CRISTO INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $47,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPRELUDE MUSIC FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE: $42,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $42,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SUMMER INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Ann Richards School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEYEAR ↗
  • Who funds MANOS DE CRISTO INC ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds PRELUDE MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMER INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Powell FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Powell Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Posey-Glickert Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Posey-Glickert Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Posey-Glickert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph