Skip to content

· Private foundation

Polycarp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$360kYouth Development$300kRecreation & Sports$205kPublic Safety & Disaster$160kAnimals$130kHuman Services$98kEducation$58kScience & Tech$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ITS THE PITS COOKERS$40,000
TACOMA YOUTH MARINE CENTER$25,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$15,000
TEXAS STATE AQUARIUM$10,000
AMERICAN LEGION CHARITIES INC$10,000
ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
YAGA'S CHILDREN'S FUND$10,000
THE THANKFUL ONES$10,000
CYPRESS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF HOUSTON$5,000
HOUSTON ZOO$5,000
TEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SEAFARERS' CENTER OF BEAUMONT: $5k → 19%ITS THE PITS COOKERS: $40k → 8%THE THANKFUL ONES: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Polycarp Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 79%.

Polycarp Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$373k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+12%

Still filing today

47%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2024 · $160k · revenue +38%
  • DP
    Digital Preservation Organization
    3× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue ×88 · 100% of their budget
  • SO
    SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SS
    SEA STAR BASE GALVESTONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $165k · revenue ×13 · 52% of their budget
  • CM
    CAFE MOMENTUM
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -11%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usvmc East Texas
Public Benefit
2
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Texas Maritime Museum Association Inc

Preservation of maritime history through exhibits and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
4
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
5
Austin Temple of Cao-Dai Tay-Ninh I
Religion
6
Disabled American Veterans of Texas Service Foundation
Human Services
7
Texas Book Festival

Texas Book Festival connects authors and readers through experiences that celebrate the culture of literacy, ideas, and imagination.

Recreation & Sports
8
Heart of Texas Historical Muse

To provide the general public with the rich heart of texas heritage

—
9
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
10
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
11
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
12
Dallas Museum of Art

The dallas museum of art is a space of wonder and discovery where art comes alive.the dma will: - place art and our diverse communities at the center around which all activities radiate - pursue excellence in collecting and programming,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Military Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sea Star Base Galveston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $230,000 · OtherJOY LUTHERAN CHURCHSEA SCOUT BASE GALVESTON: $210,000 · OtherSEA SCOUT BASE GALVESTONTEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE: $60,000 · OtherTEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN CATTLETEXAS STATE AQUARIUM: $60,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE AQUARIUMST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $52,500 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCYPRESS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $52,500 · OtherCYPRESS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHAMERICAN LEGION CHARITIES INC: $47,500 · OtherRUSH CREEK EDUCATION FUND: $40,000 · Other+10 more: $143,000 · Other+10 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $160,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…IT'S THE PITS COOKERS INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesIT'S THE PITS CO…The Thankful Ones: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesSEA STAR BASE GALVESTON: $165,000 · Recreation & SportsSEA STAR BAS…MARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC: $27,500 · EducationST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $20,000 · EducationOdyssey 2020 Academy Inc: $10,000 · EducationDigital Preservation Organization: $50,000 · Science & TechSONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC: $37,500 · Public BenefitTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyYAGAS CHILDRENS FUND INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$895,500Human Services$215,000Recreation & Sports$165,000Education$57,500Science & Tech$50,000Public Benefit$37,500Philanthropy$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEA STAR BASE GALVESTON: $165,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDigital Preservation Organization: $50,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetIT'S THE PITS COOKERS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Thankful Ones: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetYAGAS CHILDRENS FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Intergroup Association: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSeafarers Center of Beaumont: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEA STAR BASE GALVESTON ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Digital Preservation Organization ↗
  • Who funds IT'S THE PITS COOKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds The Thankful Ones ↗
  • Who funds YAGAS CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Odyssey 2020 Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Intergroup Association ↗
  • Who funds Seafarers Center of Beaumont ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Polycarp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Polycarp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Polycarp Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Polycarp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Polycarp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph