Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Point of View Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$19kEducation$10kAnimals$7kHealth$5kPublic Benefit$3kArts & Culture$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES$2,000
USO$2,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$1,000
Animal Welfare Society$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF AGING$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE THOMPSON SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 9%THE THOMPSON SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 9%THE THOMPSON SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 9%THE THOMPSON SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NY
OH
NJ
CT
MO
KY
VA
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 11 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$44k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+107%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +112%
  • DA
    Disabled American Veterans
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • WA
    WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • LT
    LOUIS T GRAVES MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TA
    THE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • DA
    DISABLE AMERICAN VETERANS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
2
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
3
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
4
Auburn Valley Humane Society

Auburn valley humane society enriches the lives of companion animals and people through animal sheltering, programs, services and community engagement

Animals
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
7
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
8
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
9
The Association for Animal Welfare Advancement

The Association conducts seminars and certification programs to carry out its exempt purposes.

10
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
11
Companion Animal Welfare Society

Companion animal welfare society inc. supports the rhode island pet owning community by providing high quality veterinary care to economically challenged individuals and families.

12
Amvets (American Veterans)

Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Welfare Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kennebunkport Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOUIS T GRAVES MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $5,000 · OtherLOUIS T GRAVES MEMORIAL LIBRARYVFW Foundation — $5,000 · OtherVFW FoundationUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS — $5,000 · OtherUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONSDisabled American Veterans — $5,000 · OtherDisabled American VeteransTHE THOMSON SENIOR CENTER — $3,000 · OtherTHE THOMSON SENIOR CENTERSt Jude Children's Research Hospital — $3,000 · OtherSt Jude Children's Research HospitalUSO — $2,000 · OtherVeterans of Foreign Wars of The United States — $2,000 · Other+5 more — $5,000 · Other+5 moreANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELF…ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELF…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,450 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING — $4,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 · HealthKENNEBUNKPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$41,000Animals$6,000Education$5,450Human Services$4,000Health$2,000Arts & Culture$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans of Foreign Wars of The United States — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEBUNKPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Veterans of Foreign Wars of The United States
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
  • Who funds KENNEBUNKPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Point of View Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 38%
  • Upper Valley Haven38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph