How much did POINSATTE-ALTMAN FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Human Services$75kYouth Development$55kCommunity Improvement$40kReligion$34kHealth$33kEducation$23kArts & Culture$18kCrime & Legal$13kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$100k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

programming

2020

wayne

2021

wayne

2022

christianfellowship

2023

—

2024

wayne

2025

hope

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $14k
$10k–50k3 grants · $40k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

NEIGHBORLINK FORT WAYNE FOUNDATION$20,000
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC$10,000
Anthony Wayne Area Council$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES$5,545
HOMEBOUND MEALS INC$5,000
LEXI'S VOICE$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$163k · 10 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$163k

$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+57%

Still filing today

80%

74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NF
NEIGHBORLINK FORT WAYNE FOUNDATION
2× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +47%
WI
WELLSPRING INTERFAITH SOCIAL SERVICES
2× · 2021–2023 · $23k · revenue +36%
CC
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC
2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +58%

Funded once

FO
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +99%
IT
IVY TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +60%
BL
Biblical Life Recovery Center Incgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +982%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Free At Last Ministries Inc

We operate our program as a ministry to address the whole person: spiritual, physical and emotional. we adhere to our core values of excellence, unconditional love and accountability. our program lasts approximately seven months to three…

Religion

Youthfront Inc

Interdenominational ministry dedicated to bringing youth into a growing relationship with jesus christ.

—

University of Indianapolis

The mission of the University of Indianapolis is to prepare its graduates for effective membership in the societies in which they live and serve, and for excellence and leadership in their lives.

Education

Good News Mission Inc

To supply hope through christ to homeless neighbors, underprivileged youth, and the medically underserved in indianapolis by creating environments of love and structure that produce a lasting difference.

Housing & Shelter

Evansville Christian Life Center

Evansville christian life center is dedicated to the restoration of people. the organization's mission is to make a life changing spiritual impact that will restore people to productive and independent living through jesus christ. by…

Human Services

Thrive Afterschool Inc

To provide holistic afterschool programming.

Education

Hoosier Outreach Inc

—

Youth Connections Inc

Enhancing the quality of life for youth and their families in our communities.

Human Services

Beacon Inc

Beacon, inc. (beacon) is an indiana not-for-profit corporation. beacon is a social service agency serving bloomington, indiana and surrounding areas. its principle programs involve providing meals and shelter to those in need, assisting…

Education

Fort Wayne Rescue Mission

To provide, through the power of jesus christ, a home for the homeless, food for the hungry, and hope for their future.

Housing & Shelter

Indiana Afterschool Network Inc

Mission: we advance learning beyond the school day by actively supporting providers with resources, training, and advocacy, while mobilizing a strong network of community partners. together, we build access to high-quality out-of-school…

Education

Indiana Health Centers Inc

To provide high quality health care services for no or minimal charges to people unable to pay. therefore to address the health needs of low income people who are unserved, uninsured or who have a high risk of various health problems by…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Isaac Knapp Dental Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/31

the rest of the field

156/1,978

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/29

Grantees still filing

23/29

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$136,289Human Services$75,396Youth Development$55,000Community Improvement$40,000Religion$34,000Health$32,500Education$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of GreaterIN53.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Parkview Health System Inc · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Mary Cross Tippmann Foundation · The James Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · M E Raker Foundation Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · Flora Dale Krouse Foundation · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation POINSATTE-ALTMAN FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ISAAC KNAPP DENTAL EDUCATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 351710974 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ISAAC KNAPP DENTAL EDUCATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 75% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Poinsatte-Altman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Poinsatte-Altman Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

POINSATTE-ALTMAN FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Poinsatte-Altman Foundation?

More from the funding graph

POINSATTE-ALTMAN FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Poinsatte-Altman Foundation?

More from the funding graph