How much did PLANNING AND ART RESOURCES FOR grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$9.6MEnvironment$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MAnimals$680kArts & Culture$435kRecreation & Sports$400kInternational$270kFood & Nutrition$60kOther$3.0M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

covidrelief

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$50k–250k5 grants · $675k
$250k+3 grants · $3.5M

$150,000

Median grant

States reached

$42M

Total assets

Largest grants

VENN FOUNDATION$2,750,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500,000
RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST$250,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$200,000
COLUMBIA GREENE HUMANE SOCIETY$150,000
CARINGKIND$125,000
THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE$100,000
DISCALCED$100,000
CARRIAGE TRADE GALLERY CORPORATION$35,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$16M · 15 repeat orgs$675k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +165% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$16M

$640k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+165%

+61%

Still filing today

67%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

VF
VENN FOUNDATION
4× · 2021–2024 · $9.6M · revenue +1895% · 44% of their budget
RL
RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST
3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +464%
IP
Innocence Project
4× · 2020–2024 · $575k · revenue +178%

Funded once

SM
Saddleback Mountain Foundation
one grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue -100%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue +1417%
HB
Hot Bread Kitchen Ltdgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Commons Inc

Partnering with individuals and organizations to access, organize, and share data that inspires action that restores our environment.

—

White Columns Inc

Founded in 1970 by artists gordon matta-clark and jeffrey lew, white columns is new york city's oldest alternative art space. white columns organizes an ongoing schedule of exhibitions, artists' projects, programs and services like our…

Arts & Culture

Eastern National

To serve america's national parks and other public trusts and their visitors

Recreation & Sports

Haleakala Inc

The kitchen is one of new york city's oldest nonprofit art centers dedicated to supporting artists working within, and across, the fields of music, dance, theater, video and film, art, and literature. founded in 1971, the kitchen has…

Arts & Culture

New York Restoration Project

To transform underserved communities by creating a greener, more sustainable new york city.

Environment

Conservation X Labs Inc

Applying technology and innovation to prevent the sixth mass extinction.

Animals

Gallery North Inc

Gallery north is a not-for-profit fine art gallery with a mission to present exhibitions of contemporary artists and crafts persons, to assist and encourage artists by bringing their work to the attention of the public, and to stimulate…

Arts & Culture

The Dc Central Kitchen Inc

—

Riders Alliance Inc

Riders alliance is fighting for a world-class public transit system that meets the everyday needs of all new yorkers and takes us toward a more equitable city and sustainable future.

Civil Rights

Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International

New York City Center Inc

The 2022-2023 season has been momentous for new york city center. fresh off our previous celebratory reopening season, city center stood at a critical juncture where it would navigate a significant leadership transition and sweeping…

Arts & Culture

Historic House Trust of New York

The historic house trust of new york city (hht), in partnership with the new york city department of parks & recreation (nyc parks), advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites in new york…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Discalced Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

11/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$9,550,000Other$3,323,000Environment$1,150,000Human Services$1,135,000Animals$680,000Arts & Culture$435,000Recreation & Sports$400,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PLANNING AND ART RESOURCES FOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VENN FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~29 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 19.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814476503 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on VENN FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 29 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Planning and Art Resources For?

Find your warmest path to Planning and Art Resources For through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PLANNING AND ART RESOURCES FOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Planning and Art Resources For?

More from the funding graph

PLANNING AND ART RESOURCES FOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Planning and Art Resources For?

More from the funding graph