Skip to content
Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota

Affirming human rights to reproductive health and freedom.

$337k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$321k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$17MHuman Services$298kCommunity Improvement$118kEducation$30k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $321k
$320,928
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ACTION FUND$320,928
RICHFIELD HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $13.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTHEASTERN MN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $70k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $6.2M → 14%SOUTHEASTERN MN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $52k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $2.9M → 14%SOUTHEASTERN MN COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $45k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $1.6M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $1.1M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $909k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $511k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA FUND: $428k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION: $91k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 6 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$17M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+33%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14M · revenue +967% · 81% of their budget
  • S
    SEMCAC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $167k · revenue +54%
  • MC
    MAHUBE-OTWA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $131k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTERS OF IOWAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $47k · revenue +33%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES
    one grant, 2022 · $39k · revenue +15%
  • HH
    HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood Voters of Nebraska

Planned parenthood voters of nebraska inspires and engages nebraskans to take up the cause of reproductive rights, health, education, and related topics through education, grassroots organizing, and legislative advocacy.

—
2
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Foundation

Supporting planned parenthood of the heartland, inc.

—
3
Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota

Affirming human rights to reproductive health and freedom.

Health
4
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Inc

To provide, promote and protect reproductive and sexual health through health services, education and advocacy.

Health
5
Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates Serving Ak Hi Id in Ky and Wa

Ppaa promotes and protects reproductive health, rights, and justice.

Health
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
7
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
8
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
9
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
10
Planned Parenthood of Northern Central and Southern New Jersey Inc

Planned parenthood of northern, central, and southern new jersey provides confidential, affordable, high-quality health care. we protect and promote the fundamental right of all individuals to make their own personal health decisions.…

Health
11
Intermountain Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…

Health
12
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood North Central States; the most unlike its peers is Semcac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION: $13,734,056 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION+1 more: $166,875 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ACTION FUND: $3,127,213 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD MI…MAHUBE-OTWA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $130,786 · Other+2 more: $66,663 · OtherSouthwestern MN Opportunity Council: $117,752 · Community ImprovementPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $39,368 · HealthHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $28,847 · HealthHIAWATHA ACADEMIES: $10,000 · Education
Human Services$13,900,931Other$3,324,662Community Improvement$117,752Health$68,215Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES FOUNDATION: $13,734,056 over 8y, 81% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ACTION FUND: $3,127,213 over 9y, 40% of budgetSEMCAC: $166,875 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMAHUBE-OTWA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $130,786 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSouthwestern MN Opportunity Council: $117,752 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTERS OF IOWA: $46,663 over 1y, 15% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $39,368 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $28,847 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAWATHA ACADEMIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Planned Parenthood Ac…The Minneapolis Found…
Planned Parenthood Action Fund IncNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · The Minneapolis Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Minnesota North Dakota South Dakota’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home