Skip to content
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Los Angeles

To provide convenient and affordable access to a comprehensive range of quality reproductive health care and sexual health information through patient services, education, and advocacy.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$15MCivil Rights$2.8MEducation$240kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $1,450,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,492,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$171M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT - LA COUNTY$1,200,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARIZONA: $534k → 11%CALIFORNIA BLACK WOMEN'S HEALTH PROJECT: $10k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $2.0M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $75k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $250k → 5%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST: $2.0M → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $1.0M → 16%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ARIZONA: $500k → 11%COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANTION: $100k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $50k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST: $250k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $250k → 16%COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $100k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $83k → 16%UCLA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%WOMEN'S MARCH LA FOUNDATION: $206k → 14%UCLA FOUNDATION: $240k → 14%RECLAIMING AMERICA'S COMMUNITIES THROUGH EMPOWERMENT: $10k → 14%EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT - LA COUNTY: $1.4M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT - LA COUNTY: $1.4M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT - LA COUNTY: $1.2M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT - LA COUNTY: $1.0M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $1.0M → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $837k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $750k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $750k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 14%BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $100k → 14%Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County: $734k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $250k → 14%BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 6 repeat orgs$6.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$12M
$6.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+0%

Still filing today

100%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsArts & CulturePublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +72%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +25%
  • BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TX SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue -100%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2.0M · revenue +11%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc. ("PPPSGV") are essential health care providers and trusted educators who center our work on sexual and reproductive care and advocate for all people to live authentic and healthy…

Health
2
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles

To provide convenient and affordable access to a comprehensive range of quality reproductive health care and sexual health information through patient services, education, and advocacy.

Health
3
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
4
Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

PP Advocates is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. Our mission is to preserve and broaden access to reproductive health care through legislation, public education, and electoral activity.

—
5
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Inc

Organized to promote and coordinate the provision of education, counseling and clinical services and to support or oppose administrative action, regulations and legislation in the field of family planning and comprehensive sexual and…

—
6
Planned Parenthood

To educate, inform, and empower individuals through accessible reproductive health services and evidence-based resources that support informed choices and personal agency.

Health
7
Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of the columbia willamette (ppcw) is to provide, promote and protect access to quality reproductive and sexual health care in oregon and southwest washington.

Health
8
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
9
Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc

The mission is to enable all marylanders to have access to a wide range of high quality, affordable reproductive health care services. by providing medical services, education, training and advocacy, ppm seeks to help individuals make…

Health
10
Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County

Educate the public on reproductive choice and healthcare options and advocate for public policies that support access to reproductive healthcare and education.

Civil Rights
11
Planned Parenthood South Texas

The purpose of Planned Parenthood South Texas ("the Organization") is to provide family planning and sexual healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved…

Health
12
Planned Parenthood Association of Utah

Ppau's mission is to empower utahns of all ages to make informed choices about their sexual health, ensure access to affordable, quality health care and education, and protect their right to do so.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains; the most unlike its peers is Womensmarchla Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County: $9,070,737 · Civil RightsPlanned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County+1 more: $200,000 · Civil RightsPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TX SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $2,000,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TX SURGICAL HEALTH S…PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC: $2,000,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $1,333,067 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC: $1,033,669 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INCCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER+7 more: $820,000 · Health+7 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $240,000 · EducationWOMENSMARCHLA FOUNDATION: $206,000 · Arts & CultureEQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $200,000 · Public BenefitREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS ACTION FUND: $50,000 · OtherRECLAIMING AMERICAS COMMUNITIES THROUGH EMPOWERMEN: $10,000 · Youth Development
Civil Rights$9,270,737Health$8,186,736Education$240,000Arts & Culture$206,000Public Benefit$200,000Other$150,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPlanned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County: $9,070,737 over 9y, 79% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION: $1,333,067 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC: $1,033,669 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA: $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $250,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $240,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENSMARCHLA FOUNDATION: $206,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $200,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $200,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LATINAS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRECLAIMING AMERICAS COMMUNITIES THROUGH EMPOWERMEN: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCalifornia Black Womens Health Project: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Liberty Hill Foundati…California Community …American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Liberty Hill FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Liberty Hill Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Los Angeles funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Los Angeles. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Los Angeles’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home