Skip to content
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky

The mission of PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY is to support the lifelong sexual health of women and men, and foster a community where every child is a wanted child.

$148k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.1MCivil Rights$405kEnvironment$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$23k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $22,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $147,540 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $125,040 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$112M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE$7,500
ART CENTERED$7,500
NA KEIKI O EMALIA$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 15% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE: $8k → 9%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCILS INC: $1.0M → 5%SAFE AND HEALTHY YOUTH WA: $30k → 9%FAIR ANCHORAGE: $100k → 22%NA KEIKI O EMALIA: $8k → 9%Affiliate Chief Executives Councils Inc: $50k → 5%SAFE AND HEALTHY YOUTH WA: $25k → 9%ART CENTERED: $8k → 9%AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCILS INC: $35k → 5%SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $125k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$45k · 36% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: CENTER FOR CREATIVE INITIATIVE IN HEALTH AND POPULATION (CCIHP) - SUPPORT FOR SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS · LIGHTHOUSE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE COMPANY (LSEC) - SUPPORT FOR SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$35k · 28% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PURPOSEFUL PRODUCTIONS - WHAT'S POSSIBLE GRANT - SUPPORT TO OVERCOME ROADBLOCKS IN ORDER TO MAKE OUR PURPOSE POSSIBLE

South Asia$23k · 18% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ARROW / YUWA NEPAL - YOUTH ACCESS TO SAFE ABORTION

Central America and the Caribbean$22k · 18% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CLINICA DE FAMILIA - SUPPORT FOR SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nonpartisan Healthcare Coalition Broken Healthcare Action Fund

Issue Committee to sponsor a ballet measure for cost transparency

—
2
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
3
No on 2

Oppose 2024 Alaska Ballot Measure 2, which would have repealed nonpartisan open primaries and ranked choice voting.

—
4
Healthierhere

Healthierhere is dedicated to reducing health disparities and improving the health and wellbeing of all people in king county through innovative, cross-sector collaborations. this corporation (continued on schedule o)partners with health…

Human Services
5
Seiu Healthcare 1199NW Multi-Employer Training & Education Fund
Health
6
National Asian American Pacific Islander Mental Health Association

Advocacy group mandated to mental health and well being of Asian American, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders.

Health
7
Yes for Portland Clean Energy Fund

Support ballot measure

—
8
People's Independent Commission

Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay

—
9
Maika I Health Corporation

To be the patient-centered healthcare home that is accessible for all and be the center for healthcare learning excellence in East Hawaii.

Health
10
Yes for Affordable Housing

Support state ballot measure

—
11
Vote Yes on 113

Supports state ballot Measure 113 that will hold politicians accountable

—
12
Pacific Asian American Women Bay Area Coalition

Represent interests of Asian-Pacific Island Women.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacific Birth Collective Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is No Cuts to Care Pac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $1,085,000 · OtherAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INCNo Cuts to Care PAC: $350,000 · OtherNo Cuts to Care PACFair Anchorage No on Prop 1: $100,000 · OtherFair Anchorage No on Prop 1Safe & Health Youth Washington: $54,999 · Other+1 more: $7,500 · OtherSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $15,000 · HealthPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $7,500 · HealthMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,597,499Health$22,500Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC: $1,085,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetNo Cuts to Care PAC: $350,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFair Anchorage No on Prop 1: $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSafe & Health Youth Washington: $54,999 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNA KEIKI O EMALIA: $7,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana and Kentucky’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home